Determining Thevenin equivalent resistance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the Thevenin equivalent resistance in a circuit and understanding the implications of short-circuiting nodes a and b. Participants explore the relationship between loop currents and the short circuit current, as well as the methodology for calculating Thevenin resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the current I3 is considered equivalent to the short circuit current between nodes a and b, suggesting that I1, I2, and I3 should all contribute to the current in a short circuit.
  • Another participant clarifies that only I3 passes from a to b in the current loop being analyzed, implying that I1 and I2 do not affect the short circuit current.
  • There is a discussion about the method for calculating Thevenin resistance, with one participant suggesting that it involves removing independent voltage sources and combining resistances, while others emphasize the importance of analyzing the circuit step-by-step.
  • Some participants express confusion about how I3 relates to the short circuit current, questioning whether the presence of a wire without resistance would affect the current distribution.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the effect of short-circuiting the 5Ω resistor, with some participants noting that this changes the resistance seen between nodes a and b.
  • One participant confirms that their calculation for Thevenin resistance is correct, based on the relationship between open circuit voltage and short circuit current.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the contributions of I1 and I2 to the short circuit current, with some asserting that only I3 is relevant. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact implications of short-circuiting on current distribution and the calculation of Thevenin resistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of circuit configurations and the relationships between different currents, indicating potential limitations in understanding without clear definitions and visual representations of the circuit.

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I am currently learning about Thevenin equivalent circuits and was posed with the question attached to this post. I was wondering why I3 is equivalent to the current formed by a short circuit between nodes a and b. Shouldn't the current between a and b be I1 + I2 + I3 since in a short circuit, all the current would go through that path? Why exactly would it be just I3?

Also, with regards to the same circuit shown in the image, isn't the Thevenin resistance computed by removing all independent voltage sources and then simply finding the resistance? That is:

$$ R_{Th} = [ (10+5)||5 + 10 ]||5 + 10 \Omega = 13.7 \Omega $$

(Where || indicates the resistance is being computed for the two parallel resistors.)

Is there anything wrong in my approach or computation? Any help is greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-10-28 at 6.33.33 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-28 at 6.33.33 PM.png
    65.2 KB · Views: 471
Physics news on Phys.org
When we write loop currents, the currents are exactly that: the current in that loop. I1 and I2 are not associated with the loop containing a and b, so they don't matter. It's the loop with I3 that's been short circuited.

As for your equivalent resistance, go through the circuit and combine one pair at a time, redrawing the circuit each time. Notice that you can't work from right to left--you have to work from left to right. Do you see that none of the resistors are in parallel or series on the right part? Remember: to be in parallel, they must share the same nodes at both terminals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hesch
TheCanadian said:
Shouldn't the current between a and b be I1 + I2 + I3 since in a short circuit, all the current would go through that path?
You have sketched 3 current loops in such a way that only I3 passes from a to b. Thus Isc = I3.

You could have sketched the currents so that all of them pass from a to b, but then your equations would be different, giving other results as for I1, I2, I3.
 
axmls said:
When we write loop currents, the currents are exactly that: the current in that loop. I1 and I2 are not associated with the loop containing a and b, so they don't matter. It's the loop with I3 that's been short circuited.

As for your equivalent resistance, go through the circuit and combine one pair at a time, redrawing the circuit each time. Notice that you can't work from right to left--you have to work from left to right. Do you see that none of the resistors are in parallel or series on the right part? Remember: to be in parallel, they must share the same nodes at both terminals.

Thank you for explaining that about the Thevenin resistance. That part makes sense now.

Hmmm, I am still not quite understanding the short circuit current. Why exactly would the current in loop 3 match the current in the short circuit between a and b? I now see my initial approach was wrong, and that I1 and I2 are not associated with the short circuit current, but how exactly is I3 related to it? Wouldn't there now be a wire without any resistor connecting nodes a and b? In this case of a short circuit, wouldn't this path receive all the current, making I1 = I2 = I3 = 0?
 
Hesch said:
You have sketched 3 current loops in such a way that only I3 passes from a to b. Thus Isc = I3.

You could have sketched the currents so that all of them pass from a to b, but then your equations would be different, giving other results as for I1, I2, I3.

Isn't I3 only through the 5 ohm resistor near nodes a and b, but not necessarily through nodes a and b?
 
TheCanadian said:
Isn't I3 only through the 5 ohm resistor near nodes a and b, but not necessarily through nodes a and b?

Normally, yes. I3 is the current that flows through that loop. However, notice that the current now has two choices: go through the 5 Ohm resistor, or take the path with no resistance. You can then essentially replace that branch with the 5 Ohm resistor with the wire alone.
 
TheCanadian said:
Isn't I3 only through the 5 ohm resistor near nodes a and b, but not necessarily through nodes a and b?
When you short circuit a and b, you short circuit the 5Ω resistor: 5Ω || 0Ω = 0Ω.

So in your attached calculation, you calculate Vab ( with ab open ). Vab,open = I3*5Ω.

Next, you calculate Isc ( with ab short circuited, substituting the 5Ω by 0Ω ).

Rth = Vab,open / Isc = 3.659Ω

Your attached calculation is absolutely correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheCanadian
Hesch said:
When you short circuit a and b, you short circuit the 5Ω resistor: 5Ω || 0Ω = 0Ω.

So in your attached calculcation, you calculate Vab ( with ab open ). Vab,open = I3*5Ω.

Next, you calculate Isc ( with ab short circuited, substituting the 5Ω by 0Ω ).

Rth = Vab,open / Isc = 3.659Ω

Your attached calculation is absolutely correct.

Thank you! This is exactly what I was missing. It's a short circuit of the 5Ω resistor as opposed to the entire circuit! It's so simple yet I was just not seeing it. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K