Calculating the Total Resistance of a Composite Wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total resistance of a composite wire made of copper and aluminum. The user initially struggles with the resistance formula R = ρL/A, applying it to both materials but receives an incorrect result. Assistance is provided, emphasizing the importance of using correct units and order of operations in calculations. The user eventually discovers that the answer must be expressed in two significant figures, which was the source of the confusion. This highlights the need for attention to detail in physics problems.
ninanoorable
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 10.0 length of wire consists of 5.0 of copper followed by 5.0 of aluminum, both of diameter 1.3 . A voltage difference of 87 is placed across the composite wire.What is the total resistance (sum) of the two wires?

Homework Equations



R=pL/A

The Attempt at a Solution


R1=1.72*10-8 *5/3.14*(0.65*10-3)2 and I've done the same method for R2 and added them to get R total..but it was wrong..i thought this question is simple..but idon't know why i couldn't solve it..help please..thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ninanoorable said:

Homework Statement



A 10.0 length of wire consists of 5.0 of copper followed by 5.0 of aluminum, both of diameter 1.3 . A voltage difference of 87 is placed across the composite wire.What is the total resistance (sum) of the two wires?

Homework Equations



R=pL/A

The Attempt at a Solution


R1=1.72*10-8 *5/3.14*(0.65*10-3)2 and I've done the same method for R2 and added them to get R total..but it was wrong..i thought this question is simple..but idon't know why i couldn't solve it..help please..thanks

hello,

it seems your idea is right. it would help if you supplied units for the given quantities.

there may be some problems with order of operations when you plug the numbers in. here is how you should type it into your calculator (you don't need all the spaces, i just put them into make it easier to read):

1.72 * 10^-8 * 5 / ( 3.14 * (0.65 * 10^-3)^2 )
 


thank you..but it didn't work either..i just donno what's wrong
 


mmm.i've just found what was wrong after using all my attempts...it's silly ..the site wanted the answer in 2 significant figures...
 


oh dear, that can be frustrating. one must try to find the humor in these things else one might punch a hole in one's computer screen. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top