Calculating the value of R for a resistor in an RLC series circuit

AI Thread Summary
In an RLC series circuit with a capacitance of 4.8mF, inductance of 0.520H, and a source voltage of 56.0V, the resonance frequency is calculated to be 20 rad/s. At resonance, the impedance of the inductor and capacitor cancels out, resulting in the full source voltage appearing across the resistor. The voltage across the capacitor is 80.0V, leading to a calculated current of 7.7A. By applying Ohm's law, the resistance R is determined to be 10.4 ohms. This conclusion is reached after verifying calculations and understanding the behavior of the circuit at resonance.
quellcrist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. An RLC series circuit has C= 4.8mF, L=0.520H, and source voltage amplitude V= 56.0V. The source is operated at the resonance frequency of the circuit. If the voltage across the capacitor has amplitude 80.0V, what is the vaule of R for the resistor?



2. ##I = (ΔVc)/(Xc)##,
##Xc= (1)/(ωc) ##,
## ω= (1)/(sqrt(LC)) ##

resonance frequency = ## (1)/(sqrt(LC)) = 20Hz##

##Xc= 10.4 ##

## Ic = IL = Ir ## in an RLC series circuit

therefore ## I= 80V/10.4 = 7.7##

At resonance frequency ##X=R##
Z is at a minimum
R is at a minimum, VL and VC cancel each other other becoming 0,
##Z= sqrt((R)^2+(XL-Xc)^2)##

##Vr=sqrt((ΔVtotal)^2-(ΔVL-ΔVc)^2)##




3. I know this question shouldn't be that hard but I have hit a mental block and cannot proceed. I know how to calculate impedance but the value of R isn't given. My question is "How do I calculate impedance when R is not given?" I know the RLC series circuit becomes purely resistive at resonance and that Z is at a minimum and Z=R. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quellcrist said:
3. I know this question shouldn't be that hard but I have hit a mental block and cannot proceed. I know how to calculate impedance but the value of R isn't given. My question is "How do I calculate impedance when R is not given?" I know the RLC series circuit becomes purely resistive at resonance and that Z is at a minimum and Z=R. Thanks!

At resonance, the impedance of the series C and L is zero, so the voltage of the source will only appear across R.

Maybe doublecheck your Xc calculation. Windows calculator gadget is giving me something different but it could be I misclicked something. I tend to get three different answers on three different attempts when I use this thing. EDIT: I was thrown by 20Hz for 1/√LC, it's 20 rad/s and then I get the same as you.
 
Last edited:
So does the value R across the resistor simply equal the value of the resistance across Vc and VL (Vc= 10.4Ω and VL=10.4Ω but since they are 180° out of phase they end up canceling each other out.) ?

I mean to say does R=10.4 ohms?
 
Last edited:
quellcrist said:
So does the value R across the resistor simply equal the value of the resistance across Vc and VL (Vc= 10.4Ω and VL=10.4Ω but since they are 180° out of phase they end up canceling each other out.) ?

The impedances of the inductor and capacitor cancel out so that the full source voltage appears across R only. The voltage across the capacitor will be equal and opposite (ie 180 degrees out of phase) with the voltage across the inductor so that adding them results in zero.

You can see it like so:

Ic = I = Vc jwC

VL = I jwL = Vc jwC jwL = -Vc w2LC = -Vc

because at resonance, w2LC = 1Or more directly:

Zl+Zc = 0 so (Vc+Vl) = IZ = 0; Vl = -VcThe series current I flows through R, C and L but generates equal and opposite voltages across C and L so that Vs appears across R only.

This means R = Vs / I which you could also get from I = Vs/Z = Vs/(R + Zl + Zc) = Vs/RIt may seem a bit strange but that's because the problem is the reverse of what is normally asked. Usually you have the resistance from which you can calculate the series current I=Vs/R (since Zc and Zl cancel at resonance). And from there you can find the voltage across the capacitor as Vc=I jwC
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clarifying this for me. I noticed this problem was weird for the same reason you stated (usually they give you a value for R and then you proceed from there).

I rechecked and re-did all my calculations. Turns out that R does equal 10.4 ohms. I found this by finding the current across Ic (since Ic=IL=Ir). I took the current and set it equal to 56V/R and solved for R. I ended up with R= 10.4 ohms.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top