Calculating the velocity of an object down a varied slope inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
An object descends a varied slope starting from a height of 5m, initially at a 63.4-degree incline before transitioning to a 7.125-degree incline over a total horizontal distance of 10m. The discussion focuses on calculating the total time for the object to complete its path by analyzing the motion in both x and y directions. Initial calculations matched for the first segment but discrepancies arose in the second segment, prompting further examination of the approach. The conversation highlights the complexity of optimizing the path using segments, suggesting that while finite segments can improve time, an ideal curve would yield the best results. Overall, the challenge lies in accurately determining the time for each segment of the descent.
dougk
An object starts at a height of 5m. The initial incline is 63.4 deg. After moving 2m in the x direction, the incline decreases to 7.125 deg and the motion continues for an additional 8m in the x direction. What is the total time for the object to complete the path?

Homework Equations


The initial move downward is 4m in the y and 2m in the x direction. The second move is 1m in the y and 8m in the x direction.

The Attempt at a Solution


Tried to solve it separating the moves and adding the time together.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dougk said:
Tried to solve it separating the moves and adding the time together.
That is a good approach. Where is the problem?
 
We solved for the time in the x direction and the y direction to make sure they matched. For the first leg, they did, for the second leg they didn't.

I took my kids to the math musuem in the city last week and we saw an exhibit that highlighted the fastest way down a gravitational field. We're trying to work out a simpler method by using segments.

Thanks,

Doug
 
dougk said:
We solved for the time in the x direction and the y direction to make sure they matched. For the first leg, they did, for the second leg they didn't.

I took my kids to the math musuem in the city last week and we saw an exhibit that highlighted the fastest way down a gravitational field. We're trying to work out a simpler method by using segments.

Thanks,

Doug
Please post your working (or there's no way to tell where you went wrong).
 
dougk said:
I took my kids to the math musuem in the city last week and we saw an exhibit that highlighted the fastest way down a gravitational field. We're trying to work out a simpler method by using segments.
No finite number of segments will give the optimum. Adding more and more segments in the right way will always improve the time - with the ideal curve as limiting case.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top