Calculating Time to Singularity in a Schwarzschild Black Hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
An observer falls radially into a Schwarzschild black hole of mass M. She starts from rest (i.e. \frac{dr}{d \tau} = 0) at r = 10M. How much time elapses on her clock before she hits the singularity?

Is my first step to take the metric equation
ds^2 = - ( 1 - \frac{2M}{r} ) dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{(1 - \frac{2M}{r})} + r^2 ( d \theta^2 + \sin^2{\theta} d \phi^2 )
and find the Euler Lagrange equations of motion?

Or is this barking up the wrong tree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just did this in class today and after substituting E=(1-2M/r)dt/dT and d(phi) and d(theta)=0 into the metric and after some algebra and assuming E=1 so dr/dT=0 at infinity we got:
(dr/dT)^2=2M/r and therefore
T=integral(sqrt(2M/r) dr) from R0 to R1

please let me know if this is what your looking for or if there is a better easier way
 
VanOosten said:
just did this in class today and after substituting E=(1-2M/r)dt/dT and d(phi) and d(theta)=0 into the metric and after some algebra and assuming E=1 so dr/dT=0 at infinity we got:
(dr/dT)^2=2M/r and therefore
T=integral(sqrt(2M/r) dr) from R0 to R1

please let me know if this is what your looking for or if there is a better easier way

ok. I'm a bit confused about the E substitution, I get a metric eqn of

ds^2 = - (1 - \frac{2M}{r}) dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{1- \frac{2M}{r}}

Now if I didvide through by d \tau^2 I get:

\frac{ds^2}{d \tau^2} = - ( 1- \frac{2M}{r} ) ( \frac{dt}{d \tau})^2 + \frac{1}{1- \frac{2M}{r}} ( \frac{dr}{d \tau} )^2

How do I substitute E into that? Do I need to multiply through by 1- \frac{2M}{r} first?

Doing this, I get

(1-\frac{2M}{r})(\frac{ds}{d \tau})^2 = - E^2 + (\frac{dr}{d \tau})^2
Why do we know to find E by looking at dr/dT at infinity?

Also, I assum you changed ds= c d \tau = d \tau
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
substitute (1-2M/r)(dt/dT)^2=(E^2)/(1-2M/r) to get
(dr/dT)^2=E^2-(1-2M/r)

and we look at r at infinity because at this limit dr/dT=0 which tells us E must be 1
also yes i assumed ds = dT
hope that helps
 
VanOosten said:
substitute (1-2M/r)(dt/dT)^2=(E^2)/(1-2M/r) to get
(dr/dT)^2=E^2-(1-2M/r)

and we look at r at infinity because at this limit dr/dT=0 which tells us E must be 1
also yes i assumed ds = dT
hope that helps

Yes but surely we don't want dr/dT=0 at r=infinity. The question tells us that dr/dT=0 at r=10M.
If you follow this through you get E^2=4/5.
This then leads to the following (much more complicated) integral that I'm sure must be wrong!
\tau = \int_{10M}^0 ( \frac{2M}{r} - \frac{1}{5} ) ^{\frac{1}{2}} dr
 
bump.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top