Calculating Torque for a Rectangular Prism Robot

AI Thread Summary
To maintain the orientation of a rectangular prism robot with a mass of 1kg and dimensions of 10cm high, 2cm wide, and 2cm long, a torque of approximately 1.3 kg.cm is required when the body is rotated Pi/12 radians forward. If the wheels are glued to the ground, this torque can counteract the rotational force effectively. However, if the wheels can spin, the torque will cause the robot to accelerate rather than maintain position, leading to challenges in balance. The discussion highlights the importance of considering factors like aerodynamic drag and friction when calculating the required torque over time. Ultimately, a torque function is sought to restore balance within one second without resulting in linear or rotational velocity.
NohtSmrt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A robot has a rectangular prism for a body. The body is 10cm high, 2cm wide, 2cm long, has a mass of 1kg and it’s mass is uniformly distributed. An axle bisects the bottom face of the body. On each side of the body is a wheel that rotates on the axle. The wheels have a radius of 1cm and have no mass. The body is rotated Pi/12 radians forward, (on the same axis as the axle). What torque needs to be applied at the axle to maintain the body’s orientation?

If the wheels are glued the ground I think the answer is…

Sin[Pi/12].1Kg.5cm
Or about 1.3Kg.cm

But if the wheels can spin, does that change the answer? (Assume that it's already moving as fast as needs to; there won't be any acceleration)

I'm actually building a similar robot and would like work out all the dynamics, but for the moment I'm ignoring as much as possible (fricition, inertia, etc...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right that the required torque is: sin[pi/12].1Kg.5cm
and this will also be required to keep the robot in this position if the wheels can spin.
However, there is a practical problem if the wheels can spin: the torque will "try" to rotate the axle with the wheels, if the wheels are glued to the ground there is no problem because an elastic force inside the glue will counteract this force and prevent the wheels from turning (and the robot from falling), if the wheels are not glued to the ground the wheels will turn and because you have to maintain the torque the robot just has to accelerate… because constant torque in this case means constant rotational acceleration…
 
Thanks for your reply.

I've talked to others and come to similar conclusion.

constant torque in this case means constant rotational acceleration

And if the wheels are rolling (not sliding) this will mean constant linear acceleration. But if we consider aerodynamic drag, then there will be a velocity at which the drag will balance friction between the wheels and the ground generated by the torque at the axle.

Ultimately I want to come up with a torque function F(t) where t is time that will put the robot back into balance by t = 1s. As well as finishing with no linear or rotational velocity.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top