Calculating Total Dipole Moment of Spherical Sheet

hansbahia
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spherical sheet of radius a has surface-charge density which depends on the polar angle θ according to the formula

σ(θ)=σ0+σ1cos(θ)

Find the total dipole moment

Homework Equations


pz=∫(dQ)z
z=rcosθ


The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the 1st dipole moment
pz=∫∫d∅dθσ0a^3sinθcos^2θ
pz=4/3pi*a^3σ0

I'm not understanding the question, "total" dipole moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hansbahia said:
I'm not understanding the question, "total" dipole moment?

When you don't understand a term, the most logical thing to do is to look it up (first try looking in your textbook & notes, and if it isn't there, then try Google, and finally just ask your instructor for clarification).

Total dipole moment just means the electric dipole moment of the entire distribution (the full vector form, not just the z-component that you get from the 2 relevant equations you posted).
 
Thanks, I figured out. I had to integrate from 0 to pi
 
hansbahia said:
Thanks, I figured out. I had to integrate from 0 to pi

But do you see why the x- and y-components of the dipole moment are zero here? Getting the right answer is not the same as solving the problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top