Calculating Transmission Factor and Intensity Ratio of Co K Radiation Filters

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
filters for Co K radiation are usually made of iron oxide power. If a filter contains 5 mg Fe2O3, what is the transmission factor for the Co K(alpa) line? What is the intensity ratio of Co K(alpha) to Co K(beta) in the filtered beam?

agh... i have no idea where to start on that question...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the K_a energy how much of the intensity will Fe2O3 absorb? And the same for K_b? Can you figure it out from here?
 
@@a you can't figure out the intensity with that limited amount of information, right?
 
You'll need the mass abs. coeffs. for the relevant energies from the x-ray data booklet or from here http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/cover.html. I don't remember if the booklet has those but the site does for sure. If you assume a cross sectional area A for the beam and require the filter to be of the same A you can solve for it's thickness and the use the good ol' Lambert-Beer law to calculate the transmittance.
 
thank you very much! :)
 
can someone show the working out for this. Do we have to draw simultaneous equations ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top