Calculating Uncertainty in R Using Partial Derivatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter questions
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the uncertainty in R using the given equation, it is essential to apply partial derivatives due to the complexity of the functions involved, such as sine and cosine. Simplifying the equation with trigonometric identities can make differentiation easier. Basic differentiation knowledge is necessary to compute the partial derivatives for each variable. The uncertainty in R can be calculated using the formula that combines the squared partial derivatives and their respective uncertainties. Familiarity with tools like Matlab or Mathematica may enhance the process, as Excel has limitations in differentiation capabilities.
questions
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a lab where I have to calculate the theoretical value of R using the following equation and then find the uncertainty in R.

R=(xCOS(y))*((-xSIN(y)-SQRT((xSIN(y))^2-2*-9.8*z))/-9.8)
*I know the values of x,y,z and their respective uncertainties.

The problem is that we have only learned basic uncertainty rules (i.e. for multiplication/division you add the %uncertainty, for addition/subtraction you add the absolute uncertainties). This is much more complicated since I have to deal with SIN/COS and square roots. I was searching around and it seems that I have to calculate the partial derivative or differentials. I am not familiar with differentials and I have no idea how to solve this problem. If anyone can offer any help whatsoever it would be greatly appreciated or anywhere where I can find this information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm using excel if that makes any difference whatsoever
 
questions said:
I was searching around and it seems that I have to calculate the partial derivative or differentials. I am not familiar with differentials and I have no idea how to solve this problem.

You are quite right about using partial derivatives. Don't be scared yet. I agree that you have a complicated expression to start with. I would suggest first simplifying it as much as possible (using trig identities). I assume you know basic differentiation? I really hope so...
When I say "simplify" I mean put it in a form that's less "scary" to differentiate. (derivatives of sin and cos can be found in any table of derivatives).

Example: If you have a function T=T(f,\lambda,...) then the error in T is found by:
(\delta T)^2 = (\frac{dT}{df})^2(\delta f)^2 + (\frac{dT}{d\lambda})^2(\delta \lambda)^2+(\frac{dT}{d...})^2(\delta ...)^2
where \delta is the error value(s).
 
questions said:
I'm using excel if that makes any difference whatsoever

I don't know if Excel can differentiate...Ever used Matlab or Mathematica?
 
To calculate the partial derivative \partial R/\partial x, differentiate R with respect to x, treating all the other variables as constants. Do likewise for the other partial derivatives.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top