Calculating Water Volume in a Tank Using Pressure Measurements

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of water in a partially filled cubic aquarium, given that the pressure at the bottom is three times greater than the pressure on one side. Participants clarify that pressure varies with depth, and they discuss how to derive the average pressure and force on the sides and bottom of the tank. The integration of pressure forces is emphasized, with guidance on how to set up the integral to find the total force on the tank's side. The conversation highlights the need to express the results in symbolic form, focusing on the relationship between water depth and pressure. Ultimately, the goal is to determine the actual volume of water in the tank based on the given pressure conditions.
  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
You are supposed to be integrating from 0 to h, not from 0 to 4. You are supposed to be integrating x, not 4.
the whole problem was stated as a volume of 64 dm3... so I thought that since 43=64 doesn't that mean h=4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Regla said:
the whole problem was stated as a volume of 64 dm3... so I thought that since 43=64 doesn't that mean h=4?
You are trying to find h. It will not be equal to 4.

h in this context refers to the height (or depth) of the water in the tank. The tank is not full.
 
  • #33
jbriggs444 said:
You are trying to find h. It will not be equal to 4.
like this?
Screenshot (116).png
 
  • #34
Regla said:
like this?
That appears to be a correct result. However, as has been suggested previously, it would be better to leave it in symbolic form and to avoid replacing ##\rho##, ##g## and ##L## with numeric values:

$$F_{side} = \rho g L \frac{h^2}{2}$$

Now can you write down a formula for the total force on the bottom of the tank in terms of ##\rho##, ##g##, ##L## and ##h##?
 
  • #35
jbriggs444 said:
That appears to be a correct result. However, as has been suggested previously, it would be better to leave it in symbolic form and to avoid replacing ##\rho##, ##g## and ##L## with numeric values:

$$F_{side} = \rho g L \frac{h^2}{2}$$

Now can you write down a formula for the total force on the bottom of the tank in terms of ##\rho##, ##g##, ##L## and ##h##?
Like this? or does the 4 have to be an x?
Screenshot (118).png
 
  • #36
Regla said:
Like this? or does the 4 have to be an x?
You can include "L" or you can include "4". Using both is nonsense. As I had suggested in #34, the correct equation is:

$$F_{side} = \rho g L \frac{h^2}{2}$$

You had previously come up with a formula for the force on the base:

Regla said:
I've got the formula for the base of the tank bF=(ro)gxL2

When you wrote that you were apparently using the variable "x" to denote depth. Let us use "h" for depth and reformat that result:

$$F_{base} = \rho g L^2 h$$

Now then. We have formulas for the force on the side and for the force on the base. The problem statement tells us the ratio of those two forces. Can you write down an equation expressing that fact?
 
  • #37
jbriggs444 said:
Now then. We have formulas for the force on the side and for the force on the base. The problem statement tells us the ratio of those two forces. Can you write down an equation expressing that fact?

Fbase/Fside=3 you mean something like this? ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3
 
  • #38
Regla said:
Fbase/Fside=3 you mean something like this? ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3
Yes. You should be able to simplify that significantly.
 
  • #39
jbriggs444 said:
Yes. You should be able to simplify that significantly.
so how do we find the volume or height of the water level? since that only tells the ratio.
 
  • #40
More calculating. Fewer questions.
 
  • #41
jbriggs444 said:
More calculating. Fewer questions.
so what does the integral in post #34? h? the height of the water level? or the number that I have to put in the post #37 formula?
but we still get the h in the integral.
 
  • #42
In #37 you had an equation:

Regla said:
Fbase/Fside=3 you mean something like this? ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3

Solve that equation for h. Or at least simplify it as I had suggested in #38.
 
  • Like
Likes Regla
  • #43
jbriggs444 said:
More calculating. Fewer questions.
I get h=0.00991988 or 0.01
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #44
jbriggs444 said:
In #37 you had an equation:
Solve that equation for h. Or at least simplify it as I had suggested in #38.
if I try to find the pressure to the bottom and side by putting in h I get always the same thing as 2. (ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)) It's a bit counter intuitive since I was stated that that should be 3, is the formula for the side equation right?
 
  • #45
ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3

Let's do a tidy re-arrangement of that equation :

ρgL2h = (3/2)ρgLh2

the ρg's cancel so :

L2h = (3/2)Lh2

Divide both sides by hL :

L = (3/2)h

Can you go from there ?
 
  • #46
Nidum said:
ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3

Let's do a tidy re-arrangement of that equation :

ρgL2h = (3/2)ρgLh2

the ρg's cancel so :

L2h = (3/2)Lh2

Divide both sides by hL :

L = (3/2)h

Can you go from there ?
that simplifies a lot of things, thanks, but when I calculate h (if L=40) it I get h=26.6667 or 27. the problem is that if I try to calculate the pressures they don't equal to the statement give in the equation (Pbase/Pside=3)
Pbase=(1000*9.8*402*27)/40*40=264600
Pside=(1000*9.8*40*(272/2)/40*27=132300
264600/132300=2. It doesn't match with the statement given. I feel like there is something wrong with the side force equation.
 
  • #47
L is not 40 . Simple numerical mistake I think ?
 
  • #48
Nidum said:
L is not 40 . Simple numerical mistake I think ?
If I know that the volume of the tank is 64 dm3 43=64 since that 4 is dm I change it into cm which is 40cm, isn't that right?
 
  • #49
Cube root of 640 is roughly 8.62

8.62cm x 8.62 cm x 8.62 cm = 640 cm3 .

.
 
  • #50
Nidum said:
Cube root of 640 is roughly 8.62

8.62cm x 8.62 cm x 8.62 cm = 640 cm3 .

.
even if I change L with 8.62 and h changes to roughly 5.75 I still get 2 when I calculate the Pressures in the way stated in post #46
 
  • #51
Regla said:
even if I change L with 8.62 and h changes to roughly 5.75 I still get 2 when I calculate the Pressures in the way stated in post #46

That is correct . The pressure on the base is twice the average pressure on the side .

Anyway you don't need to work that out except possibly for your own interest . You just need to work out the volume of the water .
 
  • #52
Nidum said:
That is correct . The pressure on the base is twice the average pressure on the side .

Anyway you don't need to work that out except possibly for your own interest . You just need to work out the volume of the water .
ohhhhhhh, so that's AVERAGE pressure, makes some sense. But is there any way to make sure that h is actually 5.75?
 
  • #53
Work out the actual areas and pressures and pressure forces . If pressure force on the bottom is three times pressure force on the side then you have the right answer for h .

To complete this problem finally what is the actual volume of the water ?
 
  • #54
Nidum said:
Work out the actual areas and pressures and pressure forces . If pressure force on the bottom is three times pressure force on the side then you have the right answer for h .

To complete this problem finally what is the actual volume of the water ?
if the height of the water is 5.75 the the volume is 427 cm3 and the weight is 0.427kg. I also have to convert the weight into kilomoles, but I think I can handle it. thanks. If I'll have any problems while going over the whole solution I'll ask here, is that ok?
 
  • #55
That's the correct answer for the water volume - good result .

Certainly ok to ask new questions anytime .
 
  • #56
Nidum said:
That's the correct answer for the water volume - good result .

Certainly ok to ask new questions anytime .
since you're an regular visitor to this forum, what do I do that his post or problem would be shown as solved?
 
  • #57
Nidum said:
That's the correct answer for the water volume - good result .

Certainly ok to ask new questions anytime .
you made a small mistake (as did I) L is 40cm, 64dm3 is not 640cm3 it's 64000cm3. It's because we're dealing with volume not length.
 
  • #58
We are told that the total volume of the cube is 640 cm3 . If that's the volume then length of side is 8.62 cm . I don't know where you get all the other numbers from ?
 
  • #59
Regla said:
64dm3 is not 640cm3
In post #1 you wrote 640cm3. Are you now saying that was wrong, that it is 64dm3?
 
  • #60
haruspex said:
In post #1 you wrote 640cm3. Are you now saying that was wrong, that it is 64dm3?
It was my mistake. I was stated that the volume is 64dm3 and stupidly stated that it's 640cm3 since I wanted it to be more applicable to people with imperial system to understand, I admit that I made a mistake, but the solution as far as I know doesn't change. it was a stupid mistake.
 

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K