Calculating Work Done: 2.2kg Rock Twirled in Perfect Circle at 2.5m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating work done on a 2.2 kg rock twirled in a circle at 2.5 m/s, it is established that the work done by the tension force is zero. This is because the tension force is perpendicular to the direction of motion, resulting in no displacement from the starting point after one complete revolution. While the distance traveled is the circumference of the circle, the net displacement is zero, which means no work is done. Participants clarify that work can be understood as the change in energy, which remains constant in circular motion. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between displacement and distance in this context.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
A rock mass 2.2 kg is attached to a string of length 1 m is twirled around in a perfect circle as a speed of 2.5m/s. Calcualte the work done on the mass by the tension force exerted on the rock by the string during one revolution of the rock. Ignore the effect of gravitational forces.

Since displacement is 0, would work be done = 0J?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sounds good to me
 
The tension is perpendicular to the direction of motion - so it should be 0.
 
can anyotne please explain to me why is displacement = 0? if displacement was 0, then there would be no circular motion of the rock right?

thanks
 
Don't confuse displacement with distance. Displacement measures your position relative to some point. If you go around in a circle, ending up where you started, your displacement from your starting point is zero. (But the distance you traveled is the circumference of the circle.)

FYI: The reason why work is zero in this case is that given by futb0l: the force is perpendicular to the velocity.
 
Just think of work as the change in energy. The Rock has the same energy in it anywhere in its circular path, so no work :smile:
 
hmmm awrite got it now... thanks much :)
 
But different force directions...
 
Back
Top