Calculating Work Done by Non-Constant Force Using Integration

AI Thread Summary
To determine the distance a 2.3 kg block must travel for the net work done by a non-constant force F(x) and friction to equal zero, the equation Wnet = Wfriction - Wf(x) is established. The force of friction is calculated using the coefficient of kinetic friction (0.21) and the block's weight. The force F(x) is defined as 25.0 - 10.0x, which requires integration to find the work done since it is not constant. The initial calculation suggested a distance of 2.026 m, but this was incorrect due to the need for integration. The correct approach involves integrating F(x) to accurately compute the work done over the distance traveled.
kopinator
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
A 2.3 kg block is acted upon by a horizontal force F(x) = 25.0 - 10.0x where the force is measured in Newtons if x is measured in meters. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the flat surface is 0.21. The block is initially at x = 0 m. What distance must the block travel if the net work done on the block by F(x) and friction combined is to be exactly zero?


Work=Fd
Force(friction)=mu x mg



The net work has to equal 0 so i set up the problem like this:
Wnet= Wfriction-Wf(x)=0
Wf(x)=Wfriction
F(x)d=Ffd (the d's cancel out)
25-10x=mu x mg (plug in numbers and solve for x)
x=2.026 m
I feel like I'm on the right track of how to solve the problem but my x is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kopinator said:
A 2.3 kg block is acted upon by a horizontal force F(x) = 25.0 - 10.0x where the force is measured in Newtons if x is measured in meters. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the flat surface is 0.21. The block is initially at x = 0 m. What distance must the block travel if the net work done on the block by F(x) and friction combined is to be exactly zero?

Work=Fd
Force(friction)=mu x mg

The net work has to equal 0 so i set up the problem like this:
Wnet= Wfriction-Wf(x)=0
Wf(x)=Wfriction
F(x)d=Ffd (the d's cancel out)
25-10x=mu x mg (plug in numbers and solve for x)
x=2.026 m
I feel like I'm on the right track of how to solve the problem but my x is wrong.
F(x) is not constant, so the work done by F(x) is not simply F(x)d .

You must integrate F(x)dx.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top