Calculating Work Done in Moving Multiple Charges in a Cube Configuration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done in moving eight charges positioned at the corners of a cube. The initial potential energy for the charges is derived, but the user realizes that simply multiplying the work for one charge by eight is incorrect due to the changing interactions as charges are removed. It is highlighted that the work done to separate the charges is the negative of the work done to assemble them, necessitating the calculation of the sum of individual works. The conversation suggests considering the potential changes when scaling the cube and integrating over the distance to infinity for a more accurate result. Ultimately, the complexity of the problem requires careful consideration of the interactions between the charges.
cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1
The question is like this:

8 charges of magnitude q and different sighs are placed at corners of a cube of side a.
Find the work done in taking them far away from each other.

Homework Equations



U = kq1q2/r
W = ΔU

The Attempt at a Solution



First i found out the potential energy of a +q charge

U = -3kq2/a + 3kq2/√2a - Kq2/√3a

and the same comes out to be for -q charge (of course)

So for 1 charge,
W = Uf - Ui
W = 0 - ( -3kq2/a + 3kq2/√2a - Kq2/√3a )

W = 3kq2/a - 3kq2/√2a + Kq2/√3a

So work done for 8 charges = 8W ... Right?

But its wrong.

Some help please.
 

Attachments

  • Ques.png
    Ques.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 448
Physics news on Phys.org
Each time you remove a charge from the group you get less work than from the last one because there are fewer and fewer charges contributing to the field.

The same thing happens in reverse, too, when you assemble charges. The first one is free -- no competing charge to work against or be attracted to. The next one sees the first charge, so there's work to be done. The next one after that sees both of the first two, and so on.
 
well what if i take all of them together?

initial U for all is same.

and obviously we won't consider value of U in b/w the process

...

So then shouldn't work done be 8W?
 
cupid.callin said:
well what if i take all of them together?

initial U for all is same.

and obviously we won't consider value of U in b/w the process

...

So then shouldn't work done be 8W?

The work done (or gained back) to take the arrangement apart will the the negative of the work done to assemble it in the first place. Either way, you need to calculate the sum of all the individual works.

I suppose you could work out how the potential changes when the cube is scaled by some factor, and then integrate from 1 to infinity. But that's going to require even more brain sweat than just calculating the work done assembling the cube one charge at a time.
 
i'll try your way and get back on this asap
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top