Calculating Work Done on a Particle Using Basic Formulas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jrlinton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work problem
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done on a 3.3 kg particle with a given position function, the user initially found the distance traveled and acceleration but arrived at an incorrect work value of 25260.6 J. The discussion highlights the need to consider the variable force acting on the particle, as the force is derived from the second derivative of the position function. Participants suggest using integral calculus to accurately compute the work done over the specified time interval. The importance of expressing the force equation clearly is emphasized for further assistance. Understanding how to apply the integral formula is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
Jrlinton
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A single force acts on a 3.3 kg particle-like object in such a way that the position of the object as a function of time is given by x = 2.1t - 1.4t2 + 1.7t3, with x in meters and t in seconds. Find the work done on the object by the force from t = 0 to t = 4.8 s.

Homework Equations


Basic work formulas

The Attempt at a Solution


So i found the distance of the movement by plugging 4.8 for t and got 165.83 m, found the second derivative of the position formula to get the acceleration function, got 46.16m/s/s at 4.8s. I multiplied these quantities as well as the mass to get 25260.6 J. This was obviously wrong
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jrlinton said:

Homework Statement


A single force acts on a 3.3 kg particle-like object in such a way that the position of the object as a function of time is given by x = 2.1t - 1.4t2 + 1.7t3, with x in meters and t in seconds. Find the work done on the object by the force from t = 0 to t = 4.8 s.

Homework Equations


Basic work formulas

The Attempt at a Solution


So i found the distance of the movement by plugging 4.8 for t and got 165.83 m, found the second derivative of the position formula to get the acceleration function, got 46.16m/s/s at 4.8s. I multiplied these quantities as well as the mass to get 25260.6 J. This was obviously wrong
Are you familiar with the integral formula for calculating the work?
 
Yes but I am ignorant as to how that would work with the givens being position and mass
 
You have a variable force. How do you find work done if you have a variable force acting on a particle?

EDIT: First, what's the expression for the force acting on the particle?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Jrlinton said:
Yes but I am ignorant as to how that would work with the givens being position and mass
Well then please show them to us and start working with the equations. That will help us a lot in helping you. If you can use LaTeX in your posts of the equations, that would be best. I'll find the link to the PF tutorial on LaTeX equations in a sec...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top