Calculating Work Done to Bring Proton to Hydrogen Atom Nucleus

confused1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
A hydrogen nucleus has a radius of 1 x 10-15 m and the electron is about 5.4 x 10-11 m from the nucleus. Assume the hydrogen atom is a ball with a radius of about 5.4 x 10-11 m and the nucleus is a ball with a radius of 1 x 10-15 m.

How much work (in electron volts) must be performed by an external force to bring in another proton (from very far away) to the "surface" of the nucleus? (Ignore the effects of the electron.)

HELP: Find the change in electric potential when proton is moved from very far away to the surface of the nucleus (a distance of 1 x 10-15 m from the proton that is already there).

HELP: Now relate this quantity to the work done by the external force. Watch your units and be careful of the sign!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much work (in electron volts) must be performed by an external force to bring in another proton (from very far away) to the "surface" of the nucleus? (Ignore the effects of the electron.)

HELP: Find the change in electric potential when proton is moved from very far away to the surface of the nucleus (a distance of 1 x 10-15 m from the proton that is already there).

HELP: Now relate this quantity to the work done by the external force. Watch your units and be careful of the sign!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top