Calculating Yield and Concentrations in a Precipitation Reaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating yield and concentrations in a precipitation reaction involving sodium fluoride and calcium nitrate. Participants express confusion over the theoretical yield and the resulting concentrations of ions in solution, particularly regarding the calculation of calcium ion concentration. One contributor highlights a discrepancy between their calculated concentration of 0.294M and the textbook's 0.268M, questioning the assumption of full dissociation. The conversation emphasizes the challenges of interpreting the problem's wording and the implications of theoretical versus actual yields. Overall, there is a consensus that the question's formulation is unclear and potentially misleading.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
17. (20 marks) A 0.410g sample of sodium fluoride is dissolved in 25.00mL of water and is then reacted with 50.00mL of 0.500mol/L calcium nitrate solution. After the mixture is filtered, 0.225g of precipitate is recovered.
a ) Write the net ionic equation for the reaction which occurs.
b) Calculate the maximum mass of precipitate that could be formed (theoretical
yield).
c) Calculate the percentage yield for this reaction.
d) Calculate the concentrations of the three major ions in the final solution.


https://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111210111858AA1ObOY
For d) This website says :Mol Ca2+ remaining in solution: 0.025 mol Ca2+ initially - 4.88X10^-3 mol CaF2 formed = 0.0201 mol Ca2+ remaining / 0.075 L = 0.268 M Ca2+

My textbook answer says the same thing.

BUT WHY! That is the result of theoretical maximum yield 100%... I get 0.294M using 0.225g.
Can you back me up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I feel dumb :S It looks really simple but I don't get that 0.268M! Why are they talking about full dissociation?!
 
It is a rather lousy question IMHO. I have no idea what is the "correct" answer here. That is, concentrations can be calculated from the solubility product, but that's an entirely different problem then.
 
I think they waant to us to keep up with the 0.255g.. But apparently we are supposed to assume full dissociation!
 
I agree. Bad formulation. And even their answer does not make sense since they ask for 0.225g dissociation.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top