Calculating Zenith Angle for Nerf Gun Targeting

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomsiv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Gun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the zenith angle for a Nerf gun to accurately hit a target using a code developed in Matlab/Simulink. The code utilizes target coordinates (x, y, z) to determine the azimuth angle and the zenith angle based on projected range and elevation. Key equations involve changes in position along the range and z-axis, factoring in total velocity and drag. The challenge lies in solving these equations simultaneously for the zenith angle (θ) and time after firing (Δt), with suggestions made to simplify the matrix setup. The conversation highlights the complexity of the non-linear equations and explores methods to derive θ efficiently.
tomsiv
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on my engineering capstone design and part of our design requires a code we have written to calculate the appropriate zenith angle for a nerf gun to fire a projectile so that the dart hits a certain target.

We are feeding the code a target coordinate (x,y,z). One section of our code tracks the azimuth angle simply using the x and y coordinates(arctan(y/x)), then the zenith angle will be based on the projected range (r = \sqrt{x^{2}+ y^{2}}) and the z value. The basic equations we are using are

Δr = vtotal*cos(θ)*Δt + .5*d*cos(θ)*Δt^{2}

Δz = vtotal*sin(θ)*Δt + .5*(d*sin(θ) + g)*Δt^{2}

where
Δr = change in position along the projected range
Δz = change in position along the z axis (elevation)
vtotal = total velocity (at muzzle)
Δt = time after firing
d = drag = -k*v2 = (we are going to assume this as a constant even though it depends on velocity)

Now since we are feeding our Matlab/simulink code a desired (x,y,z) value, we will have a desired Δr and Δz (or if you want to think in 2 dimensions a desired X and Y). So what we are trying to do is have our program solve these two equations simultaneously so that we can have a necessary θ value (zenith angle) to hit our target. Two equations, two unknowns (θ and Δt). I'm just running into problems when trying to set these up as a matrix to solve.

I feel like we may be over complicating this, because I've done similar calculations for rail gun targeting, but we had range, etc. as the unknowns and we were selecting theta values. Am I leaving something out or missing an obvious matrix solving method?

Thank you for any help you can offer, sorry if my wording is somewhat confusing.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "set these up as a matrix to solve"? Your equations are non-linear.
 
Yea, sorry, I realized that I had said that a little after posting my problem. I'm just trying to find the best way to solve for theta, using a method that can coded relatively easily (as far as computational time is concerned).
 
Multiple the second equation with ## \cos \theta ## and the first with ## \sin \theta ##; subtract the first from the second. You end up with ## \Delta z \cos \theta - \Delta r \sin \theta = 0.5 g \cos \theta \Delta t^2 ##. Divide this by ## \cos \theta ## and you obtain $$

\tan \theta = \frac {\Delta z - 0.5 g \Delta t^2} {\Delta r }

$$ bserve that $$ \cos \theta = \frac 1 { \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \theta} }$$ so the first equation becomes $$

\sqrt {\Delta r ^2 + \left(\Delta z - 0.5 g \Delta t^2\right)^2}
= v \Delta t + 0.5 d \Delta t^2 $$ which is equivalent to an algebraic equation of the fourth degree.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top