Calculation of center of mass difficult

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass for a cone, with a focus on using appropriate density measures. The initial approach involved integrating surface density for a hollow cone, but it was clarified that the cone is solid, necessitating the use of volume density instead. Participants suggested writing down the integral for the cone's volume as a starting point for calculations. Additionally, there was confusion regarding the use of "negative mass" and whether it was a simplification of previous steps, which was clarified to involve different density considerations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the type of density to use in such calculations.
eileen6a
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


~


Homework Equations



integration

The Attempt at a Solution


a) i use surface density and calculate the mass of a disk and integrate it from bottom to top. Is it right? But the cone is hollow so i only need to use the mass of the circuference?
b) use "negative mass"? are there any other approaches?
c) is it just a simplification of part a)?
thx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if you provided the actual problem.
 
i think some removed it?uploaded again as attached
 

Attachments

eileen6a said:
a) i use surface density and calculate the mass of a disk and integrate it from bottom to top. Is it right? But the cone is hollow so i only need to use the mass of the circuference?
In part a, the cone is a solid, not hollow, so you want to use the volume density ρ=m/V, where m is the mass of the cone and V is its volume.

Can you write down the integral to calculate the volume of the cone? That's a good starting point.
b) use "negative mass"? are there any other approaches?
c) is it just a simplification of part a)?
thx!
For part c, it's not quite a simplification. This time you do want to use the surface density σ=m/A, where A is the surface area of the cone, and setting up the integral is a bit different.

It would help if you show us your calculations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top