Calculation of temperature of a current-carrying wire

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the temperature of a hot cathode in an electron gun, the resistance of the material, which is temperature-dependent, can be used. The resistance at temperature T can be approximated using the formula RT = R0 [1 + α(T-T0)], where R0 is the resistance at room temperature and α is the temperature coefficient of resistance. It is recommended to find the value of α for the specific material and conduct calibration runs at known temperatures to ensure accuracy. The validity of this method at high temperatures may vary, and alternative approaches could also be explored. Accurate temperature calculation is crucial for determining the energy of emitted electrons based on the work function of the cathode.
eigenmax
Messages
58
Reaction score
12
Hello,
I'm working on an electron gun and I am wondering if there is a way to calculate the temperature of the hot cathode, from it's thickness, resistance, the amount of current running through it, or other relevant factors. This is part of an attempt to calculate the energy of the emittted electrons from the work function of the hot cathode.
Thanks for any replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eigenmax said:
I am wondering if there is a way to calculate the temperature of the hot cathode, from it's thickness, resistance, the amount of current running through it, or other relevant factors.

Not sure how accurately..

The resistance of most materials is temperature dependent. The resistance at temperature T is given approximately by:

RT = R0 [ 1 + α(T-T0)]

Where R0 is the resistance at temperature T0 eg Room temperature. α is the temperature coefficient of resistance.

Google can find α for some materials..

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-12/temperature-coefficient-resistance/
http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/formulae/resistance/resistance-temperature-coefficient.php

I don't know how valid this is at the high temperatures you are interested in. It would be best if you could do some calibration runs at known temperatures to calculate α for the material you are using over the temperature range you are interested in.

There might be better ways. I'm a bit rusty on this stuff.
 
CWatters said:
Not sure how accurately..

The resistance of most materials is temperature dependent. The resistance at temperature T is given approximately by:

RT = R0 [ 1 + α(T-T0)]

Where R0 is the resistance at temperature T0 eg Room temperature. α is the temperature coefficient of resistance.

Google can find α for some materials..

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-12/temperature-coefficient-resistance/
http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/formulae/resistance/resistance-temperature-coefficient.php

I don't know how valid this is at the high temperatures you are interested in. It would be best if you could do some calibration runs at known temperatures to calculate α for the material you are using over the temperature range you are interested in.

There might be better ways. I'm a bit rusty on this stuff.
CWatters said:
Not sure how accurately..

The resistance of most materials is temperature dependent. The resistance at temperature T is given approximately by:

RT = R0 [ 1 + α(T-T0)]

Where R0 is the resistance at temperature T0 eg Room temperature. α is the temperature coefficient of resistance.

Google can find α for some materials..

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-12/temperature-coefficient-resistance/
http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/formulae/resistance/resistance-temperature-coefficient.php

I don't know how valid this is at the high temperatures you are interested in. It would be best if you could do some calibration runs at known temperatures to calculate α for the material you are using over the temperature range you are interested in.

There might be better ways. I'm a bit rusty on this stuff.
Thanks, I'll try that.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top