Calculation of the magnetic field ring current and the magnetic flux t

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the development of open-source analytic formulas for calculating the magnetic field of a current ring using the Bio-Savart-Laplace law. Theoretical calculations led to the generation of formulas that can determine the magnetic induction vector at any point in space, which were experimentally confirmed. Additionally, these formulas allowed for the calculation of magnetic flux through closed surfaces, such as thick-walled pipes, revealing that the magnetic flux is generally not zero. However, concerns were raised regarding the validity of these calculations, as the divergence of the magnetic field should result in zero flux through any closed surface according to Gauss's theorem. The conversation highlights the tension between theoretical predictions and experimental findings in magnetic field calculations.
geca2000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This work was motivated by the lack of open source analytic formulas for calculating the magnetic field of a current ring at any point in space As the result of the theoretical calculations, which are based on the law of "Bio Savart Laplace", the analytical formulas giving the ability to calculate the magnetic induction vector of the ring current at any point in space were generated. The experimental confirmation of the theoretical formulas was obtained.


On the basis of the above formulas for the calculation of the magnetic field were obtained analytical formulas for the calculation of the flow through a closed surface, such as a thick-walled pipe. Theoretical calculations have shown that the magnetic flux through the given closed surface is not zero in general case.



https://sites.google.com/site/ringmagneticfield/home
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't followed your calculation in detail, but if there are closed surfaces such that
\int_F \mathrm{d} \vec{F} \cdot \vec{B} \neq 0,
then your calculation must be wrong, because \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B} must be fulfilled and then by Gauß's integral theorem the magnetic flux through any closed surface must vanish.
 
I was counting the magnetic flux on the basis of its determination. The fact that, in theory, it should be zero - I know
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top