Calculations involving freefall

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem where a baseball pitcher throws a ball vertically upward and catches it after 4.2 seconds. The initial calculations incorrectly used the total time for ascent and descent instead of the time to reach the peak. The correct approach involves using the equation for vertical motion, accounting for the time to the peak, which is half of the total time. The user expresses concern about their understanding of kinematics and seeks advice on effective study strategies for an upcoming test. Emphasis is placed on the importance of time management and consistent practice in mastering the subject.
SPH4UJS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A baseball pitcher throws a ball vertically upward and catches it at the same level 4.2s later

a) with what velocity did the pitcher throw the ball?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I put this into givens

t = 4.2 s
displacement = 0 m if the ball goes up and then comes back at the same level I figured it has a displacement of 0

acceleration = -9.81 m/s

Vf = 0 m/s since it goes up then reaches a climax and it was already thrown with an initial velocity that you are trying to find

so I decided to use the vf = vi + a(t)

so.. then I rearranged it so that it was

vf - ( a ) ( t ) = vi

which gave me

-(-9.81)(4.2) = vi

and then I got 41.2 but that's not the right answer :S so I am not sure if its just that I am using a wrong equation or that I have the wrong givens I don't know exactly what I am doing wrong please point me in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SPH4UJS said:

Homework Statement


A baseball pitcher throws a ball vertically upward and catches it at the same level 4.2s later

a) with what velocity did the pitcher throw the ball?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I put this into givens

t = 4.2 s
displacement = 0 m if the ball goes up and then comes back at the same level I figured it has a displacement of 0

acceleration = -9.81 m/s

Vf = 0 m/s since it goes up then reaches a climax and it was already thrown with an initial velocity that you are trying to find

so I decided to use the vf = vi + a(t)

so.. then I rearranged it so that it was

vf - ( a ) ( t ) = vi

which gave me

-(-9.81)(4.2) = vi

and then I got 41.2 but that's not the right answer :S so I am not sure if its just that I am using a wrong equation or that I have the wrong givens I don't know exactly what I am doing wrong please point me in the right direction.

With y representing the vertical direction you might want to take a look at

y = y_o + v_o t + \frac{1}{2} a t^2
 
Remember that your using vf as 0 which is at its climax. The time you used is for the total time (up and down) not just the time to get to the climax.
 
Last edited:
Alright I got the answer thank you very much. Also I have a test tommorow on this whole kinematics unit and so far I know ab out half what would be my best bet? Should I just keep doing questions until I know them all and asking for help if I can't figure it out myself? I really want to do well as I did so poorly on the quiz :S.
 
SPH4UJS said:
Alright I got the answer thank you very much. Also I have a test tommorow on this whole kinematics unit and so far I know ab out half what would be my best bet? Should I just keep doing questions until I know them all and asking for help if I can't figure it out myself? I really want to do well as I did so poorly on the quiz :S.

50 years of experience has taught me that the best bet is NOT to put off studying until the night before the exam!
 
AEM said:
50 years of experience has taught me that the best bet is NOT to put off studying until the night before the exam!

Yeah, it's not the best thing to do :s but I have no idea where my priorities are well..that and my time management skills I have put off doing physics homework until today :S. Hopefully all my questions can be answered on the forums by tomorrow. Its just I feel that I don't have the trained mindset for physics just yet, and actually not learning kinematics scares me for what's to come especially since I want to be an engineer. Btw thank you very much for your help as well as Imperitor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top