Calculations using Saturated Vapour Pressure

AI Thread Summary
When calculating the partial pressure of a gas in saturated vapor pressure (SVP) conditions, the saturated vapor pressure of water (6.28 kPa at 37°C) is subtracted from the total atmospheric pressure (101.1 kPa). This adjustment accounts for the presence of water vapor in the air, which reduces the partial pressures of other gases like oxygen. The concentration of oxygen in dry air remains constant at 21%, but as water vapor increases, the total pressure stays the same while the volume occupied by gas molecules increases. Thus, the partial pressures of oxygen and nitrogen decrease due to the added water vapor. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurate gas calculations in humid conditions.
Equium
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, new here, so don't know if this is the right place. All the other places in the forum seemed like advanced stuff!

Anyway, i don't understand why when calculating the partial pressure of a gas in SVP conditions, you subtract 6.28kPa from the normal atomospheric pressure of 101.1kPa? Could someone explain the rationale of why that's done please?

If it helps, you can email me the answer to my email: blue.rascal [at] hotmail.com

Thank you all and Merry Xmas!

Equium
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equium said:
Hi all, new here, so don't know if this is the right place. All the other places in the forum seemed like advanced stuff!

Anyway, i don't understand why when calculating the partial pressure of a gas in SVP conditions, you subtract 6.28kPa from the normal atomospheric pressure of 101.1kPa? Could someone explain the rationale of why that's done please?
What temperature are you talking about? What substance has a vapour pressure of 6.28 kPa at normal atmospheric pressure and at that temperature?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
What temperature are you talking about? What substance has a vapour pressure of 6.28 kPa at normal atmospheric pressure and at that temperature?

AM
Hi Andrew, thanks for the reply.

Sorry for not making it clear. I meant water vapour has a SVP of 6.28kPa at 37 deg C.

When calculating the partial pressure of a particular gas, say Oxygen, in the atmosphere which is saturated with water vapour, you minus 6.28kPa from the normal atmospheric total pressure of 101.1kPa and then find 21% (oxygen content in air) of that.

So I want to know why it is that you subtract the svp (6.28kPa) from the total pressure (101.1kPa) in such a calculation?
 
Equium said:
Hi Andrew, thanks for the reply.

Sorry for not making it clear. I meant water vapour has a SVP of 6.28kPa at 37 deg C.

When calculating the partial pressure of a particular gas, say Oxygen, in the atmosphere which is saturated with water vapour, you minus 6.28kPa from the normal atmospheric total pressure of 101.1kPa and then find 21% (oxygen content in air) of that.

So I want to know why it is that you subtract the svp (6.28kPa) from the total pressure (101.1kPa) in such a calculation?
Ok. I see what you are trying to do.

The concentration of Oxygen, O2, in the dry air is 21% by volume. The concentration of Nitrogen, N2 is atmosphere is 78% by volume of dry air. This relative proportion of O2 to N2 does not change. As water vapour concentration increases, the air becomes heavier as water molecules are added to the same population of O2 and N2 molecules. But the total pressure does not change. There are just more molecules which take up more volume at the same pressure. So the partial pressures contributed by O2 and N2 must decrease.

Oh, and welcome to PF, by the way!

AM
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top