Calculus maxima and minima word question can't understand

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a calculus problem involving maximizing and minimizing fencing for a rectangular field divided into two areas with a total area of 1200m². The user initially sets up the problem with three variables but realizes that it can be simplified to two variables, leading to the correct expression for the perimeter to minimize. They derive the perimeter function as P = 3600/y + 2y and proceed to find its first and second derivatives to identify critical points. The user expresses frustration over their initial confusion but ultimately seems to grasp the necessary adjustments to solve the problem effectively. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting variables in optimization problems.
singleton
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Calculus maxima and minima word question...can't understand :(

A rectangular field is going to be enclosed and divided into two separate rectangular areas (not equal either). Find the minimum fencing required if the total area of the field is 1200m^2

(See the picture attached right now)

My answer so far:
Let x represent the width of the rectangular area's width in metres
Let y represent the length of the first rectangular area in metres
Let z represent the length of the second rectangular area in metres

I've identified that we want to minimize the total amount of fencing P
So the function is:
P = 3x + 2y + 2z

Given the total area = area of first rectangle + area of second rectangle
1200 = xy + xz

The only problem is that I have three variables and I think I'm supposed to somehow do this with two as we've only been taught how to use two so far. I could figure it out with two but I don't know what is wrong with my answer so far :( Have I wrongly interpreted the question?

thanks for any help! :cry:
 

Attachments

  • wordq2.JPG
    wordq2.JPG
    2.7 KB · Views: 433
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't believe I did something so stupid! :(

I shouldn't even have y and z it should just be y

P = 3x + 2y

1200 = xy
x = 1200/y

P = 3(1200/y) + 2y
P = 3600/y + 2y

first derivative is -3600/y^2 + 2
second derivative is 7200/y^3
etc etc (I think)

blah I can't believe I did something so stupid :(
 
singleton said:
blah I can't believe I did something so stupid :(

On the other hand, you appear to have the situation well in hand.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top