Can a capacitor discharge itself through an ideal inductor?

AI Thread Summary
A capacitor can discharge itself through an ideal inductor, transferring energy between the two components. The equations governing the capacitor and inductor show that the energy stored in the capacitor is equal to the energy accumulated in the inductor. When the capacitor discharges, the current at the moment of discharge is non-zero, indicating that energy is flowing into the inductor. Specifically, the current at the discharge time can be expressed as i(t_2) = √(C/L) V, demonstrating that the charge does not simply vanish. Thus, the capacitor does not discharge itself completely; instead, it transfers energy to the inductor.
mkbh_10
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Can a capacitor discharge itself through an ideal inductor ? If yes state the reason , if No how will the charge on the capacitor will behave ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sounds like homework - what do you think the answer is?
 
So the capacitor equation is:

C \frac{du(t)}{dt} = i(t)

where u - voltage, i - current, C capacitance

And for inductor:

L \frac{di(t)}{dt} = u(t)

L - inductance

The energy transferred from capacitor to the circuit is given by:

W_C = - \int_{t_1}^{t_2} u(t)i(t)dt = C \int_{t_2}^{t_1} u(t)du = \left.\frac{1}{2} C u^2(t)\right|^{t_1}_{t_2} = \frac{1}{2} Cu^2(t_1) - \frac{1}{2} Cu^2(t_2)

The energy transferred to inductor is given by (similarly):

W_L = \frac{1}{2} Li^2(t_2) - \frac{1}{2} Li^2(t_1)

Obviously the energy transferred from capacitor is accumulated in inductor so:

W_C = W_L

If we assume that inductor is discharged in the instant t_1 then i(t_1) = 0, and capacitor is charged to the volgate v(t_1) = V. Assume that the capacitor is discharged in in t_2 instant. From the energy ballance we get the current:

i(t_2) = \sqrt{\frac{C}{L}} V

Which is obviously different than 0. From this observation you get the answer to your question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top