Can a Charged Particle's Circular Trajectory Be Proven with Newton's Second Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SoberSteve2121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Figure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that a charged particle's trajectory is circular using Newton's Second Law and the magnetic force equation F=q(V x B). Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the direction of the electromagnetic force relative to the particle's motion. There is a mention of a more complex problem involving an initial velocity at an angle to the magnetic field, which leads to a helical path. The conversation hints at the challenges of these physics problems, particularly for those seeking homework assistance. Overall, the thread highlights the relationship between magnetic forces and particle motion in a magnetic field.
SoberSteve2121
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For a charged particle the Velocity Vector is in the i direction and the magnetic field is in the -k direction, prove using Newton's Second Law that the trajectory of this charged particle must be circular. (Hint F=q(V x B) this is the magnetic Force equation.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect that this belongs to the homework help zone.

How hard is that? Think of the direction of the electromagnetic force with respect to the particle's motion.
 
kuenmao said:
I suspect that this belongs to the homework help zone.

How hard is that? Think of the direction of the electromagnetic force with respect to the particle's motion.

Don't tell him that there's an even more "difficult" problem where the charge particle has an initial velocity at an arbitrary angle to the magnetic field. I'm sure we can't solve it to get the helical path that the charge particle makes.

:)

Zz.
 
I'm not sure the OP will get the sarcasm in that second statement, so...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top