Can a position vs time graph be perfectly horizontal or vertical?

AI Thread Summary
A position vs time graph can be perfectly horizontal, indicating that an object is stationary, such as a standing animal. However, a perfectly vertical line on such a graph is impossible, as it would imply the object occupies multiple positions simultaneously, which contradicts the laws of physics. The slope of the graph represents the object's velocity; a horizontal line indicates zero velocity, while a vertical line would suggest infinite velocity. Understanding these concepts is crucial for interpreting motion graphs accurately. Thus, the claim that a position vs time graph cannot be perfectly vertical or horizontal is fundamentally correct.
caseyd1981
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I know this is going to sound easy, but I cannot find the answer anywhere..

We had a quiz today in my physics class, and one of the questions was a True/False question that stated that it is impossible for a position vs time graph of some animal to be perfectly vertical or perfectly horizontal.

We had just been told in our lecture that the velocity on a velocity vs time graph could not be vertical and I was tempted to answer True. But...could a position vs time graph of an object not be perfectly horizontal if the object was just standing still?

I answered False...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would agree that the position vs. time graph for an animal can be perfectly horizontal if the animal is standing still especially if the animal is road kill.

What do you think a perfectly vertical line implies? Can that happen for an animal?
 
Great! I hope I got it right then...I have no clue what a vertical line would imply? Is there such a thing? It seems to me that the object would have to be in 2 positions at the same time, which is impossible.

And thanks for your help!
 
caseyd1981 said:
...I have no clue what a vertical line would imply? Is there such a thing? It seems to me that the object would have to be in 2 positions at the same time, which is impossible.

More correctly, it means that the object would have to be in infinitely many positions at the same time, not just 2. The point of this question is to help you realize that the slope of the x vs t plot is the velocity of the object. "Horizontal" means zero slope, therefore zero velocity. "Vertical" means infinite slope, therefore infinite velocity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top