Can a Single Point Grapefruit Create an Interference Pattern?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that a single point grapefruit can create an interference pattern. It highlights that a single particle does not produce an interference pattern; instead, many particles are required to observe such a pattern, which emerges gradually. The calculations presented were flawed, particularly in the conversion of angles, leading to confusion about the expected results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding quantum behavior, where a particle's position collapses to a point upon measurement. Ultimately, the question misrepresents the nature of interference patterns in quantum mechanics.
stuDYING
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Even a grapefruit has a de Broglie wavelength.

If the grapefruit is thrown with a speed of 8 m/s toward a wall with two holes separated by 0.6 m, find the angular separation between successive maxima of the resulting interference pattern. Treat the grapefruit as point-like and assume its mass is 0.6 kg. Planck’s constant is 6.62607 × 10^−34 J · s. Answer in units of radian.
Relevant Equations
lambda = h/p
I tried using lamba = h/p as follows:

(6.626 * 10^-34 J *s) / (8 m.s * 0.6 kg) = 1.38041667*10^−34

and then using the small angle approximation sin(alpha) = lamba/d as follows:

(1.38041667*10^−34)/(0.6m) = 2.30069444 * 10^−34

then converting to radians with the following:

(2.30069444 * 10^−34) * (pi/180) = 4.01546931* 10^−36

However, this answer is none of the answer choices so I did something wrong. I think I might have not been supposed to use the small angle approximation but I'm not sure if that's the only thing and if so how to fix it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey there. I think you converted the ##sin(\alpha)## into radians, not the actual angle ##\alpha##. How do you change ##sin(x)## to ##x##.?
 
  • Like
Likes stuDYING
osilmag said:
Hey there. I think you converted the ##sin(\alpha)## into radians, not the actual angle ##\alpha##. How do you change ##sin(x)## to ##x##.?

Oh gosh I'm so dumb sometimes. You're completely right - thank you so much!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I don't mind preposterous problems, but I do mind nonsense problems that try to be cute but actually undermine what is to be reinforced. It's OK to suspend disbelief and go along with the gag of a "point" 0.6-kg grapefruit. However, the question asserts that there is a "resulting interference pattern." Huh? That's not OK. A single point grapefruit does not make an interference pattern; it makes a single (point) splat on the observation screen.

One needs to use many many point grapefruits to see the interference pattern eventually emerge on the screen, in this case as streaks of grapefruit juice. The gradual emergence of the interference pattern, one particle at a time, has been experimentally verified with low-intensity interference experiments. Whether you believe that a photon interferes with itself or not, when it hits that screen and you measure its position BAM! it collapses to a point in space where the probability of being there is high. This question promotes the wrong picture that a single particle generates a complete interference pattern and that one observes on the screen a superposition of identical patterns, each produced by a single particle. Tsk! Tsk! Tsk! :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top