Can Ampere's Law Confirm Zero Magnetic Field in Non-Enclosing Loops?

AI Thread Summary
Ampere's Law states that the line integral of the magnetic field around a closed loop is proportional to the net current enclosed by that loop. In scenarios where an Amperian loop does not enclose any net current, the closed line integral of the magnetic field should indeed be zero, regardless of the loop's shape. This conclusion aligns with Maxwell's equations, which support the idea that magnetic fields are influenced by enclosed currents. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between current and magnetic fields in complex configurations. Ultimately, applying these principles can help clarify the behavior of magnetic fields in non-enclosing loops.
jtabije
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I had a thought that I hope you could give me feedback on:

Imagine a complex configuration that had a steady current, such that it's magnetic field was complex as well (I apologize for using 'complex' quite loosely here). If I were to apply Ampere's Law and form an Amperian loop that did not enclose any net current, would that imply that the closed line integral of the magnetic field along the loop is zero (regardless of the Amperian loop's shape)?

My brain is saying it's zero, but my mind is not yet convinced. Hopefully you can provide me a little more insight.

With thanks,
J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Maxwell's equation (the integral form), and derive this, to convince your mind :).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Thread 'Why measure the speed of light in one direction?'

It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
View full post »

Similar threads

Is Ampere's Law Affected by External Currents?
Replies
13
Views
3K
Using Ampere's Law for these two different integration paths
Replies
1
Views
1K
Ampere's law with current loop
Replies
1
Views
2K
B field between the plates of a charging capacitor (Ampere's law)
Replies
2
Views
2K
Magnetic field due to displacement current and Ampere's law
Replies
1
Views
5K
Faraday's Law with Zero Resistance Current Loop
Replies
2
Views
7K
Doubts on Ampère's Law and Coaxial Cables
Replies
1
Views
2K
Ampere's Law: Explained and the Role of Magnetic and Electric Fields
Replies
11
Views
2K
Ampere's Law: Understanding Its Complexities
Replies
3
Views
3K
How Does Ampere's Law Apply to Complex Magnetic Field Configurations?
Replies
7
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top