Can cosh(x)cosh(y) be rewritten in terms of k=Cosech(x)*Cosech(y)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the expression Cosh(x) * Cosh(y) can be exclusively expressed in terms of k = Cosech(x) * Cosech(y). Despite attempts to manipulate hyperbolic identities, participants find that expressing Cosh(x) * Cosh(y) solely in terms of k leads to inconsistencies. Specifically, different values of sinh(a) and sinh(b) yielding the same k produce varying results for Cosh(x) * Cosh(y). This indicates that a single function f(k) cannot represent Cosh(x) * Cosh(y) uniquely for all cases. Ultimately, the conclusion is that it is not possible to rewrite Cosh(x) * Cosh(y) exclusively in terms of k.
emanuele.levi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Given the quantity

Cosh(x)*Cosh(y)


where x and y are two indipendent real variables is it possible to write it only in function of


k=Cosech(x)*Cosech(y)

?
It could seem a quite easy problem but I spent a few days between the proprieties of hyperbolic functions and I really didn't find a way to solve it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint:
Use the identity (cosh(t))^2-(sinh(t))^2=1 to solve for cosh(t).

Then use the fact that csch(t) = 1/sinh(t) so sinh(t) = 1/csch(t).
 
thank you for the hint Russell,
but that's not a solution to my problem, as I want to write the quantity

Cosh(x)*Cosh(y)


ONLY in function of k. If I did like you suggested me, I find terms like


Sinh(x)+Sinh(y)


and I can't find a way to write them in function of k.
 
It is not possible.
Assume you have some function f(k) that represents cosh(x)cosh(y) in terms of k.
When k = 1/2, then what would f(k) be?

Let sinh(a)=.5, sinh(b)=4. Then k = 1/(.5*4) = 1/2
Then cosh(a)*cosh(b)=sqr( 1+1/4)*sqr( 1+16)=sqr(85/4)=f(1/2)


However look at:
let sinh(c)=1, sinh(d)=2. Then k = 1/(1*2) = 1/2
But cosh(a)*cosh(b)=sqr( 1+1)*sqr( 1+4)=sqr(10)=f(1/2)

So, f(1/2) would not have a single output value, it is not a function.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top