Can different arguments be correct for the same complex number?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The argument of the complex number -1 - √3i is -120 degrees, which is equivalent to 240 degrees; however, the principal argument is conventionally defined to lie within the range of (-π, π]. Textbooks may adopt different conventions, with some requiring arguments to be expressed between -180 and 180 degrees, while others prefer 0 to 360 degrees. The principal argument is typically chosen to avoid ambiguity, and tools like Wolfram Alpha adhere to this convention, returning 4π/3 as the principal argument.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation
  • Familiarity with the concept of argument in complex analysis
  • Knowledge of radians and degrees conversion
  • Experience using computational tools like Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conventions of principal arguments in complex analysis
  • Learn about the polar representation of complex numbers
  • Explore the use of Wolfram Alpha for complex number calculations
  • Study the properties of complex roots and their arguments
USEFUL FOR

Students studying complex analysis, mathematicians interested in complex number properties, and anyone using computational tools for complex number calculations.

Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate argument of complex number
-1-\sqrt{3}i

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


The argument of this is -120 degrees but why couldn't we as well say it's 240 degrees? Since going 240 degrees will go to the same point as -120 degrees. Why is this false?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you say it is false? Yes, -120 degrees is the same as 360- 120= 240. If your textbook gives -120 as the argument that does not necessarily mean 240 is not. But perhaps your text is using a particular convention here: in order to avoid ambiguity some texts require that angles be given between -180 and 180 degrees, others between 0 and 360 degrees.

(Personally, I would have said that the argument was 4\pi/3. I am a little surprised you are using degrees rather than radians.)
 
The answer can be any multiple of 2\pi radians, but it's just been chosen so that the principal argument (smallest angle) is in the range (-\pi,\pi]. It's just a custom really.
 
Maxo said:

Wolfram Alpha is abiding by the principal argument custom. When you use calculators, you sometimes need to have an understanding of what their unexpected results could mean.

Like this one:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28-1%29%5E%281%2F3%29

Notice it says "Assuming the principal root". There are 3 roots, and the one with the smallest argument which is was returned to the user, while many people would expect the answer to be -1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K