Can doubling the particle density in a fusion reactor increase energy output?

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the particle density in a fusion reactor can potentially increase energy output, but several factors must be considered. The calculations presented initially contained errors, including missing units and the need for rounding to significant figures. It's crucial to account for both ions and electrons in the plasma, especially if using hydrogen isotopes like deuterium, which affects particle density. The treatment of plasma as an ideal gas is a simplification, and more advanced analyses may be necessary for accurate fusion studies. Understanding these complexities is essential for anyone studying modern physics and fusion technology.
jjson775
Messages
112
Reaction score
26
Homework Statement
A fusion reactor has achieved an ion temperature of 4 x 10^8 K, an ion density of 2 x 10^13 /cm^3 and a confinement time of 1.4 s. Calculate the amount of energy stored in the plasma of the reactor. The plasma volume of the reactor is about 50 m^3.
Relevant Equations
E = 3/2 NKbT
E= 3/2 (1.381x10^-23)(4x10^8)(2x10^19)50
E= 8.29 x 10^6 Wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A plasma contains ions and also electrons (such that the plasma is electrically neutral overall). Maybe the thermal energy of the electrons should be included. But no information is given regarding the number of electrons per ion.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
jjson775 said:
E= 8.29 x 10^6 Wrong
Two obvious mistakes are:
1) missing units;
2) answer needs rounding to 1 significant figure to match the data.

And, as noted by TSny, electrons are also present. Assuming the plasma is an isotope of hydrogen (typically deuterium), there will be equal numbers of ions and electrons. The particle density is then 2 x 2 x 10¹³ /cm³ which doubles your answer.

[Edit: However, I've seen 'ions' used as a general term for charged particles. So 2 x 10¹³ /cm³ might include both the nuclei and electrons. Or it might be just the nuclei. You may have to try both.]

Note that treating the plasma as an ideal gas is a crude aproximation. Plasma physics is very complex. (I don't claim to understand it.) If you are studying ideal gases at an introductory level, your method (plus the above corrections) should be adequate. But if you are at a more advanced level and studying fusion/fusion-reactors, a more sophisticated analysis may be needed.

I don’t see why the confinement time is given, unless needed for a subsequent question.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TSny
Doubling the particle density yields the right answer so the electrons had to be considered. I am very aware that using the formula for an ideal gas is very crude. I had also decided that confinement time is irrelevant. I am an old guy self studying modern physics from a textbook and am in a chapter on fission and fusion. Thanks for your help.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and TSny
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top