Can electroplating Cu on gold improve adhesion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Si14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gold
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on issues related to poor adhesion between electroplated copper and a 200nm gold seed layer. The initial inquiry seeks methods to enhance adhesion and questions whether depositing a layer of copper via e-beam evaporation before plating would be beneficial. A participant expresses surprise at the adhesion problem, prompting further questions about the precursors and pH of the plating solution. Ultimately, the original poster identifies that the quality of copper plating on gold is satisfactory and acknowledges a mistake in their process understanding. They note that while the process of electroplating copper on gold is feasible, the reverse—electroplating gold on copper—is significantly more challenging.
Si14
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi all:

I have a 200nm Au seed layer. and I am electroplating Cu on that using a solution. but the result is not good. The adhesion between the electroplated copper and gold seed layer is very poor and it easily peels off.
1-I wonder how can I increase the adhesion between them?

2-Does depositing (e-beam evaporation) a layer of Cu on top of the Au seed layer before plating help?

Thank you very much.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Thank you MLSmateo.
Actually, I found the problem. The Cu-plating quality on Au is good. I made a mistake.
Yes, I have read somewhere that this process is verified, but the reverse process (EP Au on Cu) is very hard to realize.
Thanks again anyways.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top