Can graphene be annealed at high temperatures without damaging Zeranin wires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erikve
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Graphene annealing at high temperatures (around 250°C) poses risks to Zeranin wires due to potential degradation of their coating. The experimental setup involves a pumped tube where the sample is heated, which raises concerns about damaging delicate components of the He3 cryostat. The current sample holder made of high sol cannot withstand temperatures above 120°C, prompting the use of vespel, a polymer that can handle up to 300°C. However, there is skepticism about whether the wires can survive the annealing process without burning, even with precautions like evacuating oxygen. It is suggested to consider rewiring with materials suitable for high temperatures to avoid damaging the setup.
Erikve
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a quite easy question, but I have no experience with this. At our lab we do a lot of experiments on low temperatures (<4K). For example we use helium-3 to obtain 500mK. To obtain this temperature we use Zeranin-wires in our setup. But now our sample (graphene) should be annealed on high temperature (~250 C) before the experiment starts. The question is: will the coating on my wires burn on this temperature or is there maybe a better wire to use at top of the insert? (since only of the insert is in the oven during warming)

Thanks for your answers!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think that the answer is yes, the coating will be degraded.
But I wonder why do you have to warm all your insert at that high temperature? I don't know what kind of system are you using, but He3 cryostats use to be delicated, warming them at such a temperature could damage it permanetly. For example the cryopump, the He3 valves or even the pressure inside the He3 volumen could be too high and explode.
If you can explain a bit more of your idea...
hope this helps
 
Maybe I was indeed a bit short about the details. Our experimental setup is in principle apart from the HE3-system, we can insert it in the He3-cryostat. So during the heating the sample is in a pumped tube with inside an insert (at top the sample). I have over here poorly no pictures, but you can see it as follows:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
--
--(stick)+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++===| (Sample)|
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

So you pump inside and flush 3 to 4 times with helium to get rid of air and oxygen. Maybe the last part is most important to prevent burning of the wires.

But why heating my sample-holder? My sample is made of graphene, a single layer of graphite. Due to different effects the sample can be doped, more electrons or holes are on the surface of the sample. By heating and pumping on my tube, I can get rid of these charges and make the sample "neutral charged". (we can shift the so-called charge neutrality point (CNP))

So far I have used a top sample-holder made of high sol, but this melts above 120 C. This temperature is not enough too anneal fast (I have now a heavily doped sample and already annealing for 3 weeks). So the new top-part is made of vespel, a high quality polymer that melts around 300 C. But as I remember from the past it can be risky too warm up the coating of my wires.

Maybe best idea is too try this by trial and error with some test wires.
 
Well at least, you won't break your insert :). But I think that your wires will be completely cooked, even if you evacuate the oxygen the coating will be burnt, at least it happened to me with manganine wires trying to do something similar.
I advice to try to rewire the sample holder, with something better for this high temperature, but I guess that it won't be valid for a He3 cryostat. Anyway why you don't anneal the substrate and the you glue it into a sample holder?
hope this help.
 
I don't do the last step, because it will be recharged by water after removing it from he-atmosphere. So that's not an option.

I think I have to rewire the part that is in oven.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top