Can I change topology of the physical system smoothly?

In summary: I think you are changing the connection (gauge field) not the bundle. The Chern number is an invariant of the bundle. It is the same for any connection. Although the Chern form will be different its integral over the surface will be the same.
  • #1
lichen1983312
85
2
I am encountering this kind of problem in physics. The problem is like this:
Some quantity ##A## is identified as a potential field of a ##U(1)## bundle on a space ##M## (usually a torus), because it transforms like this ##{A_j}(p) = {A_i}(p) + id\Lambda (p)## in the intersection between patches ##{U_i} \cap {U_j}##. So there should be a ##U(1)## bundle corresponding to this potential field and a Chern number is defined to characterize this bundle (or the physical system)
##c = \frac{i}{{2\pi }}\int_T F ##
Where ##F## is the field strength ##F = dA##.

One may change the physical system smoothly so that the potential field also changes smoothly. Let's say the system is changing with ##t##, and the potential field becomes a smooth function ##A(t)##, while the transform rule ##{A_j}(p) = {A_i}(p) + id\Lambda (p)## is still valid.

So the question is, is this smooth change of system possible to change the Chern number ##c## ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
lichen1983312 said:
I am encountering this kind of problem in physics. The problem is like this:
Some quantity ##A## is identified as a potential field of a ##U(1)## bundle on a space ##M## (usually a torus), because it transforms like this ##{A_j}(p) = {A_i}(p) + id\Lambda (p)## in the intersection between patches ##{U_i} \cap {U_j}##. So there should be a ##U(1)## bundle corresponding to this potential field and a Chern number is defined to characterize this bundle (or the physical system)
##c = \frac{i}{{2\pi }}\int_T F ##
Where ##F## is the field strength ##F = dA##.

One may change the physical system smoothly so that the potential field also changes smoothly. Let's say the system is changing with ##t##, and the potential field becomes a smooth function ##A(t)##, while the transform rule ##{A_j}(p) = {A_i}(p) + id\Lambda (p)## is still valid.

So the question is, is this smooth change of system possible to change the Chern number ##c## ?

I think you are changing the connection (gauge field) not the bundle. The Chern number is an invariant of the bundle. It is the same for any connection. Although the Chern form will be different its integral over the surface will be the same.
 
  • #3
lavinia said:
I think you are changing the connection (gauge field) not the bundle. The Chern number is an invariant of the bundle. It is the same for any connection. Although the Chern form will be different its integral over the surface will be the same.
Is this possible? let's say there are two principal bundles ##{P_1}## and ##{P_2}## over ##M##, and ##{A_1}## and ##{A_2}## are corresponding gauge fields. Is it possible to smoothly change ##{A_1}## into ##{A_2}##?
 
  • #4
Maybe the question is not so clear, I will use an example.
BZ.jpg

A physical system is represented by k-dependent Hamiltonian operators ##\hat H(k)##, where ##k## is a point in the torus. Each linear operator ##\hat H(k)## has a set of discrete eigen-functions such that ##\hat H(k)\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle = {E_n}(k)\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ##, where ##{E_n}(k)## are energy eigen-values and are real. ##\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ## is a smooth function over ##k## and the Cartesian coordinates ##r##. ##\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ## is required to be normalized such that ##\left\langle {{u_m}(k,r)} \right.\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle = {\delta _{m,n}}## where ##\left\langle {{u_m}(k,r)} \right.\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ## are defined as ##\left\langle {{u_m}(k,r)} \right.\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle = \int {dr} \,u_m^ * (k,r){u_n}(k,r)##.

However there is a phase ambiguity of ##\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ##, since
##\hat H(k){e^{i\Lambda (k)}}\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle = {e^{i\Lambda (k)}}\hat H(k)\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle = {E_n}(k){e^{i\Lambda (k)}}\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ##
So ##\left| {u{'_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle = {e^{i\Lambda (k)}}\left| {{u_n}(k,r)} \right\rangle ## is also smooth over ##k## and ##r##, if ##{\Lambda (k)}## is smooth.
For simplicity, assume there is only one energy eigen state. Now define a special connection, called the Berry's connection as
##A = \left\langle {u(k,r)} \right|{d_p}\left| {u(k,r)} \right\rangle = \left\langle {u(k,r)} \right|\frac{\partial }{{\partial {k^\mu }}}\left| {u(k,r)} \right\rangle d{k^\mu }##
(##\left\langle {u(k,r)} \right|\frac{\partial }{{\partial {k^\mu }}}\left| {u(k,r)} \right\rangle ## is pure imaginary)
so if let ##\left| {u(k,r)} \right\rangle \to \left| {u'(k,r)} \right\rangle ##
##A \to A' = A + id\Lambda ##

In the case of the graph used here, we may define smooth potential fields ##{A^A}## and ##{A^B}## on patches A and B. on the boundary set the transition function as ##{t^{AB}} = {e^{i\Lambda (k)}}## , using ##F = dA##, the Chern number is
##c = \frac{i}{{2\pi }}\int_T F ##

Now if I let the Hamiltonian ##\hat H(k)## depend on a parameter ##t## in a smooth way, the energy eigen-state ##\left| {{u_n}(k,r,t)} \right\rangle ##as well as the Berry's connection ##A(t)## change with ##t## smoothly.

is it possible at certain ##t##, the Chern number change its value ?
 

Attachments

  • BZ.jpg
    BZ.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 597

1. Can I change the topology of any physical system smoothly?

No, not all physical systems can have their topology changed smoothly. It depends on the specific system and its properties.

2. What are some examples of physical systems that can have their topology changed smoothly?

Examples of physical systems that can have their topology changed smoothly include fluid dynamics systems, electromagnetic systems, and quantum systems.

3. What does it mean to change the topology of a physical system smoothly?

Changing the topology of a physical system smoothly means that the system can be transformed into a different configuration without any abrupt or discontinuous changes.

4. Are there any limitations to changing the topology of a physical system smoothly?

Yes, there are limitations to changing the topology of a physical system smoothly. These limitations can include the complexity of the system, external factors, and the laws of physics.

5. How does changing the topology of a physical system smoothly affect its behavior?

Changing the topology of a physical system smoothly can significantly affect its behavior. It can alter the flow of energy, change the system's stability, and even lead to new emergent properties.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
611
  • Classical Physics
Replies
0
Views
127
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
721
Back
Top