Can I Simplify This Diff EQ by Using Laplace Transform and Partial Fractions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kdinser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
kdinser
Messages
335
Reaction score
2
This is actually part of a larger problem of solving a diff EQ by use of a laplce transform, but it's the partial fraction part that I'm stuck on.

\frac{1}{s^2(s^2+w^2)} = \frac{A}{s}+\frac{B}{s^2}+\frac{C*s+D}{s^2+w^2}

Good so far?

If I then multiply through by the common denominator I get

EQ.21 = A*s(s^2+w^2) + B(s^2+w^2) + s^2(C*s+D)

So then I set s=0

1=B*w^2 \longrightarrow B=1/w^2

Then using the quadratic equation, I find that the roots of s^2+w^2 are +/- jw

letting s=jw I end up with

1 = -jC*w^3 - Dw^2

this is where I get stuck, I'm not sure how to find C and D at this point.

Note: I just noticed a mistake in EQ.2,
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you can equate the various bits, ie the coefficients of the quadratic linear and constant terms. you cut out a bit of that with s=0 which is a good trick but u need the other way to get all the constants (if only in terms of w)

ie {s^2}(C*s + D) = 0

i think
 
Thanks for the reply, but I'm not really sure what you are saying.
 
You can get two equations for C and D by letting s=\pm i\omega. You can then solve for C and D.

By the way if you want to know a quick way to do this you can say the following:

<br /> \frac{1}{xy} = \frac{1}{x-y}\left\{\frac{1}{y}-\frac{1}{x}\right\}<br /> [/itex]<br /> <br /> So if I choose x=s^2+\omega^2, and y=s^2 then your initial fraction can be cast directly into the form on the RHS of your equation.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top