Can I simulate molecular structures without being a chemist?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of binding two positively charged molecules (M1+ and M2+) using oscillating electrons in the space between them. The concept involves two electrons oscillating, either in sync or out of phase, to create a bond. However, experts clarify that electrons do not behave like classical particles that can simply bounce; instead, they occupy molecular orbitals defined by probability density functions. This means that while electrons can contribute to bonding, their behavior is governed by quantum mechanics, making the proposed mechanism of oscillating electrons unlikely. Additionally, the conversation touches on related concepts like electrides and solvated electrons, which serve as anions to cations, but emphasizes that such systems are often not stable under standard conditions. For simulation purposes, participants suggest looking into software that can model molecular structures, although specifics are not provided.
edpell
Messages
282
Reaction score
4
I am not a chemist. I have a molecular structure question.

Is it possible to bind two positively charged molecules together by having two electrons bounce up and down in the space between them?

M1+ e e M2+

imagine the e, electrons oscillating up and down. Either in sync and 180 degree out of phase.

Is there any simulation software that I could use to simulate a situation like this? Thanks.

Ed Pell
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You may want to check out the literature on electrides and solvated electrons, as they're the closest thing I can think of that might be applicable, based on your description. The idea is that the electron serves as an anion to a cation in lieu of a typical counterion. I don't think most of them are stable under standard temperature and pressure, although I believe there are one or two that have been found.

If you can share more about your idea, I might be able to add more to this brief comment.
 
Are you asking if its possible to have two positively charged species bound together? Or particularly by electrons bouncing up and down?

Hydrogen molecule ion, H2+ is the simplest molecule and is an example of the former. The latter is not really how electrons behave, they don't just jump around a molecule like a classical particle might.
 
Hey edpell,

This is more an electron structure question.

M1+ e e M2+

This a charge neutral scenario. When stuff is bonded you must offset the all protons and electrons in the molecule to determine the resultant charge - though experimentally it is possible to determine if one of the molecule's constituents has more charge than the other. Here you seem to be suggesting that the 2 e's are not negating the positive charge of the 2 M's but are instead through their synchronicity/phase relationship are forming a bond between the two positively charged M's - remember electrons themselves are repulsive.

Generally electron positions - determined by probability density functions - are well understood, even in molecules i.e. cuprite, methane. The quantum nature of electrons means we can not know exactly where we will find them in the atom/molecule when we look for them let alone what they were doing before we looked i.e. oscillating.



ch@rlatan.
 
edpell said:
I am not a chemist. I have a molecular structure question.

Is it possible to bind two positively charged molecules together by having two electrons bounce up and down in the space between them?

M1+ e e M2+

imagine the e, electrons oscillating up and down. Either in sync and 180 degree out of phase.

Is there any simulation software that I could use to simulate a situation like this? Thanks.

Ed Pell

You gave a very complicated description of a covalent bond, however electrons will not "bounce" in the way you suggested - they occupy a molecular orbital and their position is uncertain (read more about wavefunctions).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top