Can I Use Parallel Buck Converters to Achieve Higher Amperage?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using multiple 1A buck converters in parallel to achieve a total output of 5A for a specific application. Participants explore the technical challenges, potential solutions, and risks associated with this approach, including the concept of thermal runaway and methods to mitigate it.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using multiple 1A buck converters in parallel to achieve the desired 5A output, emphasizing the need for a common controller to balance the load.
  • Others argue that without a controller, differences in performance among the converters could lead to overheating and thermal runaway.
  • A suggestion is made to use voltage controlled oscillators (VCOs) and a microprocessor to manage the output pulses to each converter.
  • Concerns are raised about the risks of thermal runaway, which could occur if one converter draws more current due to temperature variations.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of calibrating each converter using potentiometers to prevent thermal runaway, but some express skepticism about the effectiveness of this approach.
  • One participant suggests that limiting the input voltage might prevent thermal runaway, but another counters that even slight voltage variations could trigger issues.
  • Alternative solutions are proposed, such as using current limiters with each converter to manage the total output current effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges of using multiple converters in parallel and the risks of thermal runaway. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to mitigate these risks or whether it is feasible to use the converters without a controller.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that all converters will behave identically under load, which may not be the case due to manufacturing variances. The discussion also highlights the complexity of designing a system that can safely distribute current among multiple converters.

Puglife
Messages
157
Reaction score
2
I have a ton of 1A buck converters, and have a 5A application in which i need to run. I do not want to order any new buck converters, because I already have so many 1A ones, and do not have money for any new ones. Each one can only handle 1A before it over heats.

I was wondering if I could use multiple 1A buck converters in parallel with each other in order to achieve 5A? if not, could i some how modify the buck converter i have to handle 5 times more amperage?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Puglife said:
I was wondering if I could use multiple 1A buck converters in parallel with each other in order to achieve 5A?
Yes, you can.
But you must have a common controller, sensing five currents, that distributes the total load current equally between them.
Otherwise one of them will be over heated.
The controller must generate various pulses to each of the converters.
 
Hesch said:
Yes, you can.
But you must have a common controller, sensing five currents, that distributes the total load current equally between them.
Otherwise one of them will be over heated.
The controller must generate various pulses to each of the converters.
Is is at all possible to do it without one, if not how would i make one?
 
Puglife said:
Is it at all possible to do it without one, if not how would i make one?
I don't think so. There will always be small differences between the converts, and if one of them yields just a little more current than the others, it could be a little more heated up, increasing the problem/difference. It could make a thermal run away.

I will suggest five VCO's ( voltage controlled oscillators ) that counts up five counters, therby forming an integrating A/D-converter that smoothes the noisy currents.
A μ-processor could read/sample the counters and be programmed to output suitable pulses for the buck-converters.
 
Hesch said:
I don't think so. There will always be small differences between the converts, and if one of them yields just a little more current than the others, it could be a little more heated up, increasing the problem/difference. It could make a thermal run away.

I will suggest five VCO's ( voltage controlled oscillators ) that counts up five counters, therby forming an integrating A/D-converter that smoothes the noisy currents.
A μ-processor could read/sample the counters and be programmed to output suitable pulses for the buck-converters.
so what exactly would happen if I where to just put them in parallel?
 
Puglife said:
so what exactly would happen if I where to just put them in parallel?
Try! You have five fingers, so you can sense the temperature for each of them with one hand.

Your other hand could be used to increase voltage/current/load slowly.

If one of your sensing fingers starts smoking, you have a problem with your parallel converters.
 
Hesch said:
Try! You have five fingers, so you can sense the temperature for each of them with one hand.

Your other hand could be used to increase voltage/current/load slowly.

If one of your sensing fingers starts smoking, you have a problem with your parallel converters.
I don't want to burn any out if their is a risk, I would like to know first, exactly how to solve the problem. Could i distribute it between 6 or 7 in parallel instead? would that work?
 
Puglife said:
I don't want to burn any out if their is a risk, I would like to know first, exactly how to solve the problem. Could i distribute it between 6 or 7 in parallel instead? would that work?
Your fingers will be the ones to be burned as the first. Your transistors will give up at 200 C°.

Using 6 or 7 converters, one of them may still make a thermal run away.
 
Hesch said:
Your fingers will be the ones to be burned as the first. Your transistors will give up at 200 C°.

Using 6 or 7 converters, one of them may still make a thermal run away.
so what exactly causes a thermal runaway?
 
  • #10
Puglife said:
what exactly causes a thermal runaway?
E.g. some transistor that decreases its VBE voltage due to a higher temperature, thereby conducting more current than the other transistors.
So this transistor will be even more heated up, . . . . ., and so on.

Also the kernel of the inductor will change characteristics due to temperature.
 
  • #11
Hesch said:
E.g. some transistor that decreases its VBE voltage due to a higher temperature, thereby conducting more current than the other transistors.
So this transistor will be even more heated up, . . . . ., and so on.
they each have potientiometers on them, in which i can control the voltage, is it possible for me to adjust each one individually, and test them out, and change the POT for each one, to prevent that from happening, sort of like calibrating them?
 
  • #12
Puglife said:
they each have potientiometers on them, in which i can control the voltage
You need a potentiometer that can control the temperature/current on the fly.

That's what my suggested controller will do: Adjust on the fly.
 
  • #13
Hesch said:
You need a potentiometer that can control the temperature/current on the fly.

That's what my suggested controller will do.
so you can't just calibrate them once, and avoid any sort of thermal runaway?
 
  • #14
Puglife said:
so you can't just calibrate them once, and avoid any sort of thermal runaway?

The term "thermal run away" means that something is completely out of control. It won't just increase the temperature by some predictable 10 degrees. It will increase the temperature forever until something evaporates.

It's the butterfly that starts a tornado.
 
  • #15
Hesch said:
The term "thermal run away" means that something is completely out of control. It won't just increase the temperature by some predictable 10 degrees. It will increase the temperature forever until something evaporates.
i know, but the reason that happens, is because one of the buck converters gets a change in voltage, which causes it to draw more current, causing a chain reaction right, so why can't you just limit the voltage that can come into your buck converters to 5v to prevent that?
 
  • #16
Puglife said:
why can't you just limit the voltage that can come into your buck converters to 5v
You cannot limit some voltage to 5.00000000000000V, but to say 5.0001V

These extra 0.0001V is the butterfly to start the tornado.
 
  • #17
Hesch said:
You cannot limit some voltage to 5.00000000000000V, but to say 5.0001V

These extra 0.0001V is the butterfly to start the tornado.
so what is the absolute cheapest way to stop this from happening, I need to make a ton of these, and need it to be as cheap as humanly possible. Thank you
 
  • #18
Puglife said:
so what is the absolute cheapest way to stop this from happening, I need to make a ton of these
Make a big buck-converter that can handle 5A.
No distribution problem.
You need a ton of these.
 
  • #19
Hesch said:
Make a big buck-converter that can handle 5A.
No distribution problem.
You need a ton of these.
is their any way of doing it asside from that?
 
  • #20
Puglife said:
is their any way of doing it asside from that?
Yes, of course.

Example:
You can connect a current limiter at the output of every buck-converter, say 6 converters + 6 current limiters, each limited to 0,9A.
Then you will have a total current = 5.4A.

But I don't think that will be the cheapest way.
 
  • #21
Hesch said:
Yes, of course.

Example:
You can connect a current limiter at the output of every buck-converter, say 6 converters + 6 current limiters, each limited to 0,9A.
Then you will have a total current = 5.4A.

But I don't think that will be the cheapest way.
would i buy current limiters, if so what are they called, can i make them, if so how?
 
  • #22
Puglife said:
would i buy current limiters, if so what are they called, can i make them, if so how?
Well, there is a simple one here:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1IR-mer3QzDDInkNJlb-8QoP1efRGlNz1rqD3QRRuDiHDcdUT.jpg

You can choose other circuits here:

https://www.google.dk/search?q=curr...-JbLAhUzb5oKHWmBDS0Q_AUIBygB&biw=1920&bih=946
 
  • #24
I don't know.
 
  • #25
Hesch said:
I don't know.
ok, that's fine, do you know where i could buy one, so that i may compair the prices, Thanks!
 
  • #26
No, I'm not staying in the USA.
 
  • #27
Hesch said:
No, I'm not staying in the USA.
ok, that's fine, you have been of great help to me, just one last question, do i put the limiters on the inputs, or outputs of the buck converters?
 
  • #28
Puglife said:
do i put the limiters on the inputs, or outputs of the buck
On the outputs.
You must calculate with a voltage drop across the suggested current limiter of about 1V, using silicon transistors.
 
  • #29
Hesch said:
On the outputs.
You must calculate with a voltage drop across the suggested current limiter of about 1V, using silicon transistors.
what do you mean?
 
  • #30
Say you need 10V on the output of the current limiter, the buck converter must yield 11V on the output.
11V - 1V = 10V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K