Can L Be Isomorphic to sl(2,C)?

ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Take

L = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & -a & -b \\b & c & 0 \\a & 0 & -c\end{array}\right)

where a,b,c are complex numbers.

Homework Equations



I find that a basis for the above Lie Algebra is

e_1 = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 \\1 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)

e_2 = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & -1 \\1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)

e_3 = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -1 \end{array}\right)

I then calculate all the products [e_i,e_j] and see that L is non-abelian and simple

The Attempt at a Solution



The question then asks show L is isomorphic to sl(2,C). I have found e,f,h \in L such that [h,e] = 2e, [h,f] = -2f, [e,f] = h
where,

h = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 2 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -2 \end{array}\right)

e = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & -\sqrt{2} \\ \sqrt{2} & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)

f = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & -\sqrt{2} & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 \\ \sqrt{2} & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)

if I haven't made any mistakes. I see L is homomorphic to sl(2,C) but how do I show it's an isomorphism? (i.e show the injection and surjection). I know the definitions for an injection map and a surjection map but don't know how to apply it in this case.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You've just written down a sub-algebra isomorphic to sl_2, and clearly it is all of the space (just by dimension arguments). There is nothing more to show.

You haven't actually written down a map so you can't apply the notion of injection or surjection. If you want to put in a map - there is an obvious one - then it is trivially an injection (and a surjection).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top