Can Light Rays Cross Near a BH? - Simulated w/ Matlab

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
Haorong Wu
Messages
422
Reaction score
90
TL;DR
When I simulate that two parallel light rays pass near a Kerr BH, the result shows that they cross each other. Is it possible?
Hi. I use Matlab to simulate that two parallel light rays pass near a Kerr BH. The angular momentum of the BH points to the ##z## direction. The ##z## components of the start points of the two rays are ## 1\times 10^3 ~\rm{m}## and ##- 1\times 10^3 ~\rm{m}##, respectively. The result, as shown in the figure, indicates that the rays cross each other. In the end, the ##z## components of the two rays are ##-667~\rm{m}## and ##667~\rm{m}##, respectively.

I am not sure if this is possible or not. Maybe there are some errors in my model. How can I check if my result is correct or not?

Thanks.
untitled.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't really explained your initial conditions, so it's hard to comment. I think your rays start symmetrically above and below the equatorial plane. What are their initial directions, and what are the mass and angular momentum parameters of the hole?
 
@Ibix

Sorry, I thought that is not important, so I did not mention it. Here are the parameters (all are in Cartesian coordinates):

mass of BH is ##1.988\times10^{30}~\rm{kg}=1.47\times10^3~\rm{m}## ;
angular momentum per unit mass is ##0.9## (along z-axis);
position of BH is ##(0,~0,~0)##;
initial positions of rays are ##(-1\times 10^4,~2\times 10^4,~1\times 10^3)## and ##(-1\times 10^4,~2\times 10^4,~-1\times 10^3)##, respectively;
both initial wave vectors are ##(1.03\times 10^7 ,~1.82\times 10^6 , ~ 0)##;

The results are:
the final positions of rays are ##(9.12\times 10^4,~1.55\times 10^3,~-667)## and ##(9.12\times 10^4,~1.55\times 10^3,~667)##, respectively;
the final wave vectors are ##(1.05\times 10^7,~-2.28\times 10^6,~-1.90\times 10^5)## and ##(1.05\times 10^7,~-2.28\times 10^6,~1.90\times 10^5)##, respectively.

The wave number is increased by ##2.36\times10^5~\rm{m^{-1}}##, but I think that is due to the calculation error of the ode45 algorithm.
 
Last edited: