Can Man-Made EM Waves Cause Vibrations in Powders?

AI Thread Summary
Man-made electromagnetic (EM) waves can produce physical vibrations in objects, but the effect is minimal. Light carries momentum and can exert a slight push on materials, while other frequencies like ULF, ELF, and LF radio waves can also impart heat or a small force if the materials absorb or reflect them. However, the vibrations caused by these waves are generally negligible, with heating being the more significant effect. Not all substances respond the same way to EM waves, as their absorption and reflection properties vary. Overall, while EM waves can influence powders like sand or talc, the impact is limited and primarily involves heating rather than substantial vibrations.
rockhouse
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Can man-made EM waves produce physical vibrations of objects? Can man-made EM waves vibrate powders like sand or talc?
I'm trying to understand if any types of electronic frequencies can cause physical vibrations...thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rockhouse said:
Can man-made EM waves produce physical vibrations of objects? Can man-made EM waves vibrate powders like sand or talc?
I'm trying to understand if any types of electronic frequencies can cause physical vibrations...thanks.

Light and other em waves carry a (small) momentum, so they 'push' on things very slightly but you need a lot of light.
 
Hmmm, makes sense since light has mass...
What about inaudible radio waves such as ULF, ELF, LF? Can they cause physical vibrations?
Thanks.
 
rockhouse said:
Hmmm, makes sense since light has mass...
What about inaudible radio waves such as ULF, ELF, LF? Can they cause physical vibrations?
Thanks.

Photons don't have rest mass but they do have momentum. Any frequency em radiation is the same basic phenomenon as light.
 
rockhouse said:
Hmmm, makes sense since light has mass...
What about inaudible radio waves such as ULF, ELF, LF? Can they cause physical vibrations?
Thanks.

* Light (and other EM radiation) actually is mostly likely massless (or at least absolutely-ridiculously small).

* 'Vibrations' is vague. EM radiation can heat substances and 'push' substances. Heat is a form of 'vibration' if you will. (EM radiation can also obviously do other stuff too)

* Inaudible radio waves? I wasn't aware any EM waves were 'audible'.

* Not all substances absorb / reflect all em waves.

So, for the things that do absorb / reflect ULF, ELF, LF will in return be imparted heat, or a 'push'. But I need to reiterate how small this force is... and heat is your most likely return... the material would have to be reflective to get a 'push'.
 
Ok, thanks.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top