Can Man-Made EM Waves Cause Vibrations in Powders?

AI Thread Summary
Man-made electromagnetic (EM) waves can produce physical vibrations in objects, but the effect is minimal. Light carries momentum and can exert a slight push on materials, while other frequencies like ULF, ELF, and LF radio waves can also impart heat or a small force if the materials absorb or reflect them. However, the vibrations caused by these waves are generally negligible, with heating being the more significant effect. Not all substances respond the same way to EM waves, as their absorption and reflection properties vary. Overall, while EM waves can influence powders like sand or talc, the impact is limited and primarily involves heating rather than substantial vibrations.
rockhouse
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Can man-made EM waves produce physical vibrations of objects? Can man-made EM waves vibrate powders like sand or talc?
I'm trying to understand if any types of electronic frequencies can cause physical vibrations...thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rockhouse said:
Can man-made EM waves produce physical vibrations of objects? Can man-made EM waves vibrate powders like sand or talc?
I'm trying to understand if any types of electronic frequencies can cause physical vibrations...thanks.

Light and other em waves carry a (small) momentum, so they 'push' on things very slightly but you need a lot of light.
 
Hmmm, makes sense since light has mass...
What about inaudible radio waves such as ULF, ELF, LF? Can they cause physical vibrations?
Thanks.
 
rockhouse said:
Hmmm, makes sense since light has mass...
What about inaudible radio waves such as ULF, ELF, LF? Can they cause physical vibrations?
Thanks.

Photons don't have rest mass but they do have momentum. Any frequency em radiation is the same basic phenomenon as light.
 
rockhouse said:
Hmmm, makes sense since light has mass...
What about inaudible radio waves such as ULF, ELF, LF? Can they cause physical vibrations?
Thanks.

* Light (and other EM radiation) actually is mostly likely massless (or at least absolutely-ridiculously small).

* 'Vibrations' is vague. EM radiation can heat substances and 'push' substances. Heat is a form of 'vibration' if you will. (EM radiation can also obviously do other stuff too)

* Inaudible radio waves? I wasn't aware any EM waves were 'audible'.

* Not all substances absorb / reflect all em waves.

So, for the things that do absorb / reflect ULF, ELF, LF will in return be imparted heat, or a 'push'. But I need to reiterate how small this force is... and heat is your most likely return... the material would have to be reflective to get a 'push'.
 
Ok, thanks.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top