Can mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 /X? Find Out!

  • Thread starter Thread starter A13235378
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the equation mv^2 /2 + mu^2 /2 + kq^2 /L = kq^2 /X, questioning its validity and the implications of ignoring gravitational interactions. Participants express confusion over the terminology used, particularly regarding the minimum distance and the phrase "Despise the gravitational interaction." Clarifications are made about reducing a two-body problem to a one-body problem using reduced mass, with a consensus that only the reduced mass can be determined, not the individual masses. There is a suggestion to wait for a problem attempt from the original poster before proceeding further. The conversation highlights the need for clearer communication and understanding of the physics involved.
A13235378
Messages
50
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Two identical particles with velocities u and v, which form angles α and β with the straight line that joins them, are at a distance l from each other. The charge of each particle is q. Determine the mass of the particles, knowing that the minimum distance between the two is X. Despise the gravitational interaction.
Relevant Equations
mv^2 /2
kq^2 /d
1596743358220.png
I can only say that:

mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 /X

Yes or not and why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever translation software you are using isn't very good. "knowing that the minimum distance between the two is worth" sounds like a critical part of the problem, and I have no idea what that means. As for "Despise the gravitational interaction", I already do. :wink: We can't help you if we don't understand you.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Whatever translation software you are using isn't very good. "knowing that the minimum distance between the two is worth" sounds like a critical part of the problem, and I have no idea what that means. As for "Despise the gravitational interaction", I already do. :wink: We can't help you if we don't understand you.

Sorry , I am spanish , my english is not very good. I already correct.
 
A13235378 said:
Sorry , I am spanish , my english is not very good. I already correct.
And "Despise the gravitational interaction" means to ignore the gravitational attraction between the masses, right?

(I also edited your thread title for you to make it a bit clearer) :smile:
 
berkeman said:
And "Despise the gravitational interaction" means to ignore the gravitational attraction between the masses, right?

(I also edited your thread title for you to make it a bit clearer) :smile:
yeah
 
Are you familiar with reducing a two-body problem with a central force to a one-body problem with a reduced mass ##\mu##? For example, see this .

It seems to me that you will be able to find only the reduced mass. You won't be able to find the individual masses of the two particles.
 
A13235378 said:
mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 /X
That would be true if they were stationary at closest approach. Will that be so?
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
TSny said:
It seems to me that you will be able to find only the reduced mass. You won't be able to find the individual masses of the two particles.
It says they are identical...
 
Maybe we should wait for a problem attempt.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe we should wait for a problem attempt.

But I was about to post my Excel simulation as a cross-check for the OP to check their work. Oh, wait... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Back
Top