Can New Isotope Methods Improve Neutron Confinement in Nuclear Reactors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for new isotope methods to improve neutron confinement in nuclear reactors. Ideas include capturing emitted neutrons using specific isotopes and utilizing electromagnetic fields for slowing them down, although neutrons themselves cannot be influenced by EM fields due to their neutrality. The conversation shifts to speculative concepts about magnetic confinement fusion and gravity effects, but these ideas are deemed outside the forum's focus. Participants emphasize the need for scientifically grounded discussions rather than personal speculations. Ultimately, the thread is closed due to rule violations regarding speculative content.
andrew848
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am certainly not qualified to really comment on this subject, but I have been playing around with some ideas on how to confine neutrons to the interior of a nuclear reactor. I was wondering if there was a way to capture a emitted neutron from a reaction with a selected isotope that would be able to hold on to it long enough be slowed down with a EM field. the heavier isotope being centrifuged out then emitting it into a neutron trap in a ultra cold state and hopefully being able to hold it long enough to decay into a proton.
Side note for funsies that's definitely sci fi, wouldn't magnetic confinement fusion benefit from something that caused a disproportionate amount of gravity pulling particles to the center of the reactor and together. stimulating the higgs field? What amount's to a black hole or a neutron star in the shape of a ring?
Again all of this is well beyond me.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
andrew848 said:
slowed down with a EM field

Neutrons are electrically neutral, so you can't slow them down with an EM field.
 
PeterDonis said:
Neutrons are electrically neutral, so you can't slow them down with an EM field.
But the isotope its bound to isn't. Not even sure if such a element exists with a useful half life and decay type.
 
andrew848 said:
the isotope its bound to isn't

You weren't talking about confining isotopes, you were talking about confining neutrons.

In any case, PF is not for personal speculations. Please review the PF rules. I won't even comment about your speculation about fusion confinement.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top