Can Object A Be Neutral Based on Charge Interactions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether object A can be neutral based on its interactions with objects B and C. A and B attract each other, while B and C repel, leading to questions about A's charge. It is clarified that a neutral particle does not experience attraction or repulsion from charged particles, but can still be attracted through polarization. The participants agree that A could indeed be neutral, despite the limited information available. The conversation suggests that the problem would be clearer if framed around three point-like charged objects.
kickthatbike
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Three objects (A, B, and C) are brought close to each other one at a time. A and B attract, but B and C repel. Simple true/false question involving "is this one positive/negative/etc." What I'm unsure about is whether or not A could possibly be neutral, or more specifically, is there any way to tell with certainty based on the limited information whether or not it IS neutral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no neutral charges, only positive and negative charges. A neutral particle is neither attracted to nor repulsed by a charged particle.
 
Fair enough. Thank you!
 
kickthatbike said:
Three objects (A, B, and C) are brought close to each other one at a time. A and B attract, but B and C repel. Simple true/false question involving "is this one positive/negative/etc." What I'm unsure about is whether or not A could possibly be neutral, or more specifically, is there any way to tell with certainty based on the limited information whether or not it IS neutral?

A charged object can attract neutral ones by polarizing them. A rubbed plastic rod (or a simple comb) will attract small and light paper pieces. See: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/u8l1c.cfm (experiment with a rubbed balloon and bits of paper). So you are right, A can be neutral, too.

The problem should have been asked about three point-like charged objects.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top