Can rational functions inside logarithms have removable discontinuities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



f(x) = ln[(x-x^2)/x]

Is x = 0 a removable discontinuity?

Homework Equations



Removable discontinuities are points that can be filled in on a graph to make it continuous.

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it? I know that with rational functions, canceling out factors can result in removable discontinuities. For example, the function (x+2)/[(x+2)(x+3)] has a removable discontinuity at x = -2 since the factor (x+2) can be canceled out.

What about rational functions inside logarithms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:

Homework Statement



f(x) = ln[(x-x^2)/x]

Is x = 0 a removable discontinuity?

Homework Equations



Removable discontinuities are points that can be filled in on a graph to make it continuous.

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it? I know that with rational functions, canceling out factors can result in removable discontinuities. For example, the function (x+2)/[(x+2)(x+3)] has a removable discontinuity at x = -2 since the factor (x+2) can be canceled out.

What about rational functions inside logarithms?

What do you think? If you think the answer is NO, why would you think that? Ditto if you think the answer is YES.
 
@Qube: you appear to have answered your own question without realizing it.
Probably you need to focus on what it means for a discontinuity to be "removeable".

Removable discontinuities are points that can be filled in on a graph to make it continuous.
... not quite right is it? If you plotted y=(x+2)/[(x+2)(x+3)] would there be a discontinuity on the graph?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top