Can Relativity Explain the Possibility of Aliens Visiting Earth?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of relativity on the possibility of alien visitation to Earth, highlighting that high-velocity travel could theoretically allow aliens to return to their home planet far into the future. While physics does not completely rule out the possibility of extraterrestrial life visiting Earth, the immense energy requirements for interstellar travel pose significant challenges. The aging effects experienced by travelers moving close to the speed of light complicate the feasibility of such journeys. Additionally, the discussion notes that as speed increases, mass becomes exponentially greater, making travel at light speed practically impossible. The concept of wormholes is mentioned as a potential but currently hypothetical solution to these challenges.
childsy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This question might not belong in this category, and it may seem a bit of an out there question also...
Based on the principals of relativity, if aliens are real (that i hope so), wouldn’t they come back to their planet far into the future after visiting our own planet?? I ask this because they must have to travel at a very high velocity and doing so over a great distance will bring you into the future of that planet.
Does physics support the possibility of aliens visiting earth, or does it disagree with this theory?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
childsy said:
Does physics support the possibility of aliens visiting earth, or does it disagree with this theory?
They could leave tomorrow and still arrive before you post this message... :eek:
 
Physics makes it very difficult for aliens to get here, though not impossible. They could have much longer lifespans than us, not care about their age upon return, etc, but it does constrain the practicality of spaceflight to other solar systems.
 
In the sense that some people believe that ET might be visiting - coming and going at will - ET would have to know much that we don't. Based on what we do know from Relativity, it seems unlikely that any species would undertake an interstellar flight. The energy requirement is highly problematic if not impossible to ever achieve.

Physics is not complete so we can't really be sure what is and is not possible.
 
Depending on how close to the speed of light that they are traveling, "they" (i.e. the travelers) would have aged much more slowly than those on their home planet (or ours).

But that's not the real issue. As you approach the speed of light, things start getting much, much more massive (traveling the speed of light would cause you to have infinite mass). This requires more and more (exponential) amounts of energy (to travel the speed of light would require an infinite amount of energy). So, (hopefully) there're some important things about astrophysics that we don't know yet.

Wormholes provide a interesting possibility, but that is just a hypothesis right now.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
98
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
85
Views
9K
Back
Top