B Can Satellites Orbit Within Earth's Atmosphere and How Close Can They Get?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mateo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
AI Thread Summary
Satellites cannot achieve stable orbits within Earth's atmosphere due to significant atmospheric drag and friction, which would hinder their ability to maintain orbital velocity. While theoretically, a sufficiently fast satellite could orbit at altitudes between the Mesosphere and Exosphere, practical challenges make this unlikely. The discussion also touches on the fictional concept of the Death Star, clarifying that it was powered by a fusion reactor rather than solar panels. Overall, the consensus is that atmospheric conditions create insurmountable obstacles for sustained satellite orbits. The complexities of aerodynamics and friction render low-altitude orbiting impractical.
Mateo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, was just wondering if gravitational orbit be achieved inside the Earth's atmosphere. Or how close a satellite can be to the ground?

Additionally, would the Death Star have been completely covered in solar panels?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which part of the atmosphere are you referring to? And no, if I'm correct, the Death Star had a fusion reactor.
 
Orbit can be falling when tangential velocity can path beyond horizon when vertical is less than escape velocity. a sufficiently såeedy satellite could orbit the Earth within the atmosphere, but friction would be a huge practical problem.
 
I suppose I would like to know if something can orbit between the Mesosphere and the Exosphere without using rockets.
Didn't think of friction- that is problematic.
 
It is possible, but it's unlikely
 
Mateo said:
I suppose I would like to know if something can orbit between the Mesosphere and the Exosphere without using rockets.
Didn't think of friction- that is problematic.
Aerodynamics is too.
 

Thread 'Need help understanding particle physics and quantum physics'

So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
View full post »

Thread 'Raman Spectroscopy help'

I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
View full post »

Similar threads

How Does the Jacchia Model Predict Atmospheric Drag for Satellites in LEO?
Replies
1
Views
3K
B How Do Missiles Reenter Earth's Atmosphere?
Replies
33
Views
5K
B Is Photon Rotation Key to Solar Wind and Earth's Orbit Stability?
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Nodal Precession: Satellites Orbiting Earth Explained
Replies
22
Views
3K
How to know the shape of a specific location on Earth?
Replies
15
Views
2K
B Barycenter: Objects orbiting each other
Replies
11
Views
3K
Can Solar Panels Orbiting the Sun Beam Energy to Earth via Lasers?
Replies
28
Views
4K
Potential Energy and raising a satellite from Earth into a Circular Orbit
Replies
5
Views
2K
I A New Idea for the Origin of Earth's Water
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How Does the Coriolis Effect Influence Great Circle Motion on Earth?
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top