Can someone calculate a fun probability for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dontbelievthebull
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the improbability of a character from the TV show Lost winning the lottery with 'cursed' numbers and subsequently ending up on an island that corresponds to those numbers. The odds of winning a 6-number lottery are stated as 1 in 13,983,816, but the actual odds for Hurley's jackpot are likely lower due to its high value. By considering the Earth's surface area and the size of the island, the user estimates that there are about 4 lottery tickets that could correspond to the island's coordinates, resulting in odds of 1 in 3,495,954 for landing on the same coordinates as the winning numbers. This calculation suggests that the scenario is more probable than winning the lottery itself, prompting a request for any challenges to this conclusion. The discussion highlights the intersection of probability theory and popular culture.
dontbelievthebull
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
I have been involved in a discussion on another forum about the TV show Lost. For those who haven't seen it a character (Hurley) wins the lottery with numbers that are supposedly 'cursed' and ends up stranded on an island. It turns out that the island is actually all about these particular numbers in various ways.

Someone is saying that this is just a highly improbable event. I would like to show exactly how improbable.

The odds that I found for winning a 6 number lottery are 1 in 13,983,816, although Hurley's jackpot was over 100 million so the odds are actually much less I'm sure but I couldn't find a stat for this.

The Earth has a surface area of 196,935,000 square miles.

If we say that the island is 50 square miles, and use the lottery numbers as the coordinents for it, is it possible to calculate what the odds are for ending up at the same cooridinents as the numbers used to win the lotto?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dontbelievthebull said:
Hello all,
I have been involved in a discussion on another forum about the TV show Lost. For those who haven't seen it a character (Hurley) wins the lottery with numbers that are supposedly 'cursed' and ends up stranded on an island. It turns out that the island is actually all about these particular numbers in various ways.
Someone is saying that this is just a highly improbable event. I would like to show exactly how improbable.
The odds that I found for winning a 6 number lottery are 1 in 13,983,816, although Hurley's jackpot was over 100 million so the odds are actually much less I'm sure but I couldn't find a stat for this.
The Earth has a surface area of 196,935,000 square miles.
If we say that the island is 50 square miles, and use the lottery numbers as the coordinents for it, is it possible to calculate what the odds are for ending up at the same cooridinents as the numbers used to win the lotto?

Lets say there are 13,983,816 different lottery tickets and that each is keyed to an equal-sized part of Earth such that the entire surface is covered. This gives about 14 square miles per ticket. Thus on a 50 square mile island, there would be at least 4 tickets that would be keyed there, usin your figure for Earth's surface area. This gives 4/13,983,816 = 1/3,495,954.
 
Wow that actually makes a lot of sense. I never would expect the odds of this to be more likely than that of winning the lotto alone.

Anyone challenge this?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top