Lagrangian for Rolling Cylinder on Inclined Plane | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter kala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a rolling cylinder on an inclined plane. The user proposes a Lagrangian expression, combining kinetic and potential energy, but seeks confirmation on its accuracy. Key points include the need to express all variables, such as velocity and angular velocity, in terms of the generalized coordinate x. The moment of inertia for a uniform cylinder is confirmed as I = 1/2 m R^2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the rolling without slipping condition before proceeding with the Lagrange equations.
kala
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Write down the Lagrangian for a cylinder mass m, radius R an moment of inertia I, that rolls without slipping straight down an inclined plane which is at an angle a from the horizontal. Use as your generalized coordinate the cylinder's distance x measure down the plane from its starting point. Write down the Lagrange equation and solve it for the cylinder's acceleration.





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to find the Lagrangian, this is what i have so far, is it right?
i said that T=1/2mv2+1/2Iw2
and U= -mgxsina so my Lagrangian would be
L=1/2mv2+1/2Iw2+mgxsina.
I think this is correct, but I'm not positive. If it is right then should i write I and w (omega) differently? and then continue with the partial differentiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything is correct, except that you must express all the dynamical variables (v, w) in terms of x and its derivatives, as the problem tells you. Also you can explicitly specify the value for I, since you know the shape of the body.
 
so if i remember right v=x' but i am not sure what I and w are in terms of x and derivatives. doesn't I have something to do with R, the radius?
 
w is the angular velocity, which for non-slipping case is given by

\omega = \frac{v}{R} = \frac{\dot{x}}{R}

and I hope you can figure out the moment of inertia I yourself.
 
I= 1/2 m R2?
Just checking before I go on with the partial derivatives.
 
Yes, for a uniformly filled cylinder.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top