Can someone explain head to tail bunch differential acceleration?

ballistikk
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I was given an assignment involving finding the head to tail bunch differential acceleration of a beam of muons loading onto an RF cavity, and it occurred to me that my understanding of the concept might be keeping me from working the problem. Can somone concisely explain it to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ballistikk said:
I was given an assignment involving finding the head to tail bunch differential acceleration of a beam of muons loading onto an RF cavity, and it occurred to me that my understanding of the concept might be keeping me from working the problem. Can somone concisely explain it to me?

You did not give any clear info on what are the parameters of the bunch and the RF.

Is your bunch length shorter than the RF period? What is the geometry of the RF pulse? Is it a TM mode?

If all you have is a finite length bunch shorter than the RF, and you have the E-field along the direction of propagation (z-direction typically), then you can easily assume that the E-field has a sinusoidal profile both in space and in time. Since the Lorentz force is simply qE, you then have the actual force acting on each length segment of the muon bunch. That automatically tells you the acceleration of each part of the muon bunch.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top